An election deal is the only way

January 07, 2013 12:00 am | Updated December 04, 2021 10:54 pm IST

Nepal does not have a legislature. The executive’s legitimacy is contested, with a caretaker >government commanding limited authority and a ceremonial President flirting dangerously with constitutional limits. Its judiciary is operating at less than half strength since there is no Parliament to confirm new appointments. The five-member Election Commission (EC) has only two commissioners left, who are also retiring in a week. The interim constitution did not envisage the current situation where the Constituent Assembly (CA) would fail to draft a statute. >Elections for a new CA could not be held in November and prospects for holding them in April-May are diminishing. There is no agreement in sight over the nature and composition of the government, the electoral system, voter roll disputes, EC appointments, and a mechanism to clear the constitutional hurdles for elections. With President Ram Baran Yadav saying he will not pass election-related ordinances till there is a ‘political consensus,’ each major party has a veto. As the ruling party, the Maoists will have to bear their share of the blame. Chairman Prachanda has constantly shifted positions. He and Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai are engaged in an intra-party battle which has hardened their respective positions in inter-party talks. But the attitude of the opposition — particularly the Nepali Congress (NC) — has been destructive and undemocratic. It first rejected the Maoist idea of reviving the old CA to promulgate the constitution. The Maoists then invited the NC to join the current government, take key ministries, and appoint its nominee as the Chief Election Commissioner to ensure free and fair polls; but this was also turned down.

The NC’s sole demand is that the PM must go and it should be given government leadership. In any democracy, the government last elected on the floor of the house remains in-charge till polls are held and then transfers power, but Nepal’s opposition wants power before polls. The Maoists and Madhesi parties in government said they were open to NC leadership, if the party owned the work done in the last CA and joined the current government temporarily to end the ‘politics of untouchability.’ The NC, however, wanted power unconditionally. The PM’s latest proposal is to hand over power to a neutral civil society figure, with the limited mandate of holding polls. This could serve as a compromise formula if such an arrangement has the sincere support of all parties. If they want to redeem themselves, Nepal’s parties must arrive at a deal in the next fortnight and hold elections by May to restore constitutional order and political legitimacy.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.