President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner of Argentina has won re-election in a landslide which is historic for several reasons. With voting compulsory and 97 per cent of results declared, the winner's vote share of 54 per cent obviates the need for a runoff. The victory margin of 36 percentage points over the second-placed Hermes Binner of the Broad Progressive Front is the second largest in the country's history. It is exceeded only by the legendary Juan Perón's win in 1973, which included additional support under the complex two-round system for presidential elections. This time, Ms Kirchner won over 90 per cent of the vote in some provinces. Secondly, she is the first woman head of state in Latin America to win a second successive term in office. Thirdly, the President's Victory Front coalition has won eight out of nine provincial governorships, recapturing the wine-growing Mendoza province in the process. In effect, the electorate has resoundingly endorsed the political and economic strategies followed by Ms Kirchner and her predecessor, her late husband Néstor Kirchner.
Furthermore, the election results send messages far beyond Argentina's borders. They are consistent with the strong left and centre-left commitments Latin American voters have shown for a dozen years now, in Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil, and Chile as well as Argentina. They also confirm the benefits of well-strategised government intervention in the economy. In the last decade, Argentine GDP has grown by 94 per cent and poverty among the 41 million population has declined by two thirds. Moreover, inequalities have been reduced, in contrast to countries where high aggregate growth has been accompanied by huge increases in inequality. It is true that Buenos Aires will need a backup plan for what is expected to be a slowdown in the country's global trade. Inflation at a decadal peak of 20 per cent remains a concern. But the successive Kirchner governments' strategies expose the hollowness of two current orthodoxies. The first is that recessions must be followed only by slow recoveries; the Argentine economy was back on its feet within three years of a financial meltdown in the late 1990s. The second shibboleth is that debt requires economic shrinkage. Argentina's revival started after it defaulted on a $95 billion debt and resolutely ignored the prescriptions of international financial institutions in order to revive a broadly interventionist political economy. That strategy could be a model for many other countries, and Ms Kirchner's renewed four-year mandate is therefore all the more welcome.
Keywords: Argentina polls, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner


In India , I think there was always an Argentinian situation, sadly Indian voters vote went on and on for politics of casteism and communalism on several occasions even if people were in hardships of poverty.
The south american story should alarm us all. Over the years, these regions has overwhelmingly witnessed dictatorship, communism and finally democratic socialism. Argentina is a lively example of self-dependency and ideal governance. Defying the current global crisis it has come a long way since the inflation hit all time high during the economic debacle of 2000-2003. India must take a leaf out of this, and not merely depend on Capitalist economies who are in a brink of disaster.
Where there is a will , there is a way. But in India our leaders are more interested in their personal and partisan interests than in the welfare and well being of the people. In order to get votes for gaining political power, they follow short-cuts and populist policies which prove to be the undoing of the country's economy. Subsidies , NAREGA and other doles evidence it .
Cristina Fern won the election due to sympathy vote since her husband (and former Argentinean President) died last year. The leaning toward the left is welcome, capitalism will not be the absolute system for long in the countries that are practicing it.
A Wide coverage of important international issues by THE HINDU is a praiseworthy step.This definitely enhances the interest of a reader in international issues.
Why can't our government learn from Argentina? Perhaps the instincts of greed are greater than the sense of responsibility. What is astonishing is our rulers do not change even when the economy is in trouble and the coffers are nearly empty. What is the remedy to improve our sense of ethics? Needn't we think on these lines to start with?
Please Email the Editor