The unfolding environmental catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico must convince governments everywhere that the economic costs of poor regulation of the oil industry can be staggering. Tens of thousands of barrels of reddish oil from the stricken Deepwater Horizon offshore well have turned much of the Gulf into a life-sapping zone. The oil has paralysed the economy of coastal communities, mainly in Louisiana. If computer-modelling studies published by the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States turn out to be reasonably accurate, the vast swathe of oil could harm more areas of the Atlantic coast over the next four months — the first signs are already visible in Florida. Such gloomy scenarios and the distressing images of dying oil-soaked birds, sullied beaches, and worried citizens pose a serious challenge to President Barack Obama. His immediate task is to exert sufficient pressure on oil giant BP to ensure that the gusher on the ocean floor is capped. After four major failed manoeuvres, there appears to be some progress in the latest effort to cap the well and pump the oil out by ship. Yet permanent relief wells may have to wait for quite a while. The disaster raises serious questions about safety in the global offshore oil industry. In the U.S., the evidence indicates that rules and regulations governing deepwater drilling were weak and often not enforced.
The hope is that the criminal and civil enquiry will throw light on the reports that BP was granted a series of exemptions by the regulator, the Minerals Management Service, on safety testing and contingency plans for accidents. Public statements by BP indicate that it scrambled for solutions after the event, and had to employ untested methods to stop the flow of oil. Containment equipment, meant for use in the event of a blowout in the mile-deep well, was not readily available when disaster struck. It was fabricated later, resulting in a fortnight's delay. The U.S. regulator suffers from a serious conflict of interest, as it has to both encourage oil production and police the process. This has apparently led to a standard regime of exemptions in safety enforcement. All this clearly indicates that the oil industry, which has been paying out billions of dollars to investors, must be made fully accountable. What emerges from the BP incident is the absence of a response plan to manage deepwater disasters. That is scary, considering there are as many as 50 such operations in the Gulf of Mexico alone. There are many global conventions against pollution of the seas. It is imperative, therefore, that countries permitting oil exploration publish their regulatory requirements on the Internet along with records of compliance by an industry that never sacrifices big profits.
Keywords: environmental pollution, oil exploration, Gulf of Mexico, oil spill



The poor wild life!!! God help the inosent! They don't deserve this.
This problems needs a serious action due to irreversible environmental effect of this accident. Making rules more strict and checking that if they are being followed or not is one of the basic duty of government and it shouldn't be taken as outcome of this accident. After investigation if it is proved that it was due to carelessness of BP, it should be penalized of which only bleak hope is visible. Nowdays collusion between government and giant corporates is more conspicuous than ever before and in these circumstances hoping for a unbiased action against BP is all environmentalist can do.
Where is our environmentalists....Do they have any proposal to cap? Do they have any alternatives to oil? Do they have any guidance to the industry?
BP's oil pipeline burst.
What is the problem? BP did not follow safety standards.
What government must do? Increase regulative controls.
What about profits of private companies? Sacrifice the profits and maintain safety and compliance.
These are the problems and answers suggested in the article. I don't think increasing regulation and decreasing profits is the way to run private industries, although these are the quick fixes a conventional communist ideology would stipulate. There is a consumer price element also.I this problem BP has made mistake. But at least now, can we find out how many deep water oil pipelines have complied with safety regulations and are keeping the emergency equipment ready? Or will we wait until another accident occurs? Besides, I can't understand why this is BP's problem. It is a human problem and all governments, scientists and engineers have to move on a war footing to solve it. Isn't it an irony that another oil company Chevron runs a homily on its 'teaching- seeking- building' ideology while BP is left to handle the problem alone? Obama appears concerned with punishing BP, not solving the problem.
The fact of the matter seems to be that underwater oil pumping is dangerous. Unless all this is eschewed, the problem is likely to repeat somewhere else. Why can't we decide to reduce our consumption of oil and stop all the underwater production?
Let us face it. There is no cheap oil any more except in some pockets of the world. There should be a global ban on risky oil production just like the NPT.
There should notbe any politics or lobbying to frame and execute strict regulations.
Well said. Thank you for weighing in on our side of the world.
Please Email the Editor