SEARCH

Opinion » Columns » Ted Corbett

Updated: August 9, 2013 01:04 IST

The messy DRS affair

Ted Corbett
Comment (1)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
England's Kevin Pietersen during a nets session on the eve of the fourth Ashes series cricket match against Australia at the Riverside cricket ground, Chester-le-Street, England on Thursday.
AP England's Kevin Pietersen during a nets session on the eve of the fourth Ashes series cricket match against Australia at the Riverside cricket ground, Chester-le-Street, England on Thursday.

One day DRS will become perfect

It was supposed to be a quiet series between the Ashes holder England and a poor Australian team. England wins 5-0, Australia goes home with its kangaroo tail between its legs and England drowns in champagne and good wishes.

Instead Australia has found the guts to fight back from 2-0 down and the whole series seems to have descended into a row about the rights and wrongs of DRS. I blame the surfeit of ex-players writing and commentating and, frankly, sensationalising the series.

Half a dozen umpiring decisions have caused the hackles of these experts to rise sky high and since the start of the third Test in Manchester there has been an almost continuous technology lecture.

Silicon tape issue

Channel Nine in Australia has even broadcast allegations that Kevin Pietersen may have used silicon tape on his bat so that the electronic device known as Hot Spot cannot detect whether the ball has hit the edge. (He would be mad to try such a trick because it might mean that the TV umpire would not see a faint edge if the appeal was for lbw.)

“If I’m out I walk,” he said on Twitter and as long as I have been watching KP that has been true. I have called him all sorts of names but I have never even thought he might be a cheat. Great batsmen are usually too interested in making heaps of runs to think how to avoid getting out. So cheating and KP — you can forget it.

Michael Clarke, the Australian captain, says no-one in his dressing room would dream of cheating and I reckon that’s true too. Australian batsmen may attempt to strike innocent young English players in bars after midnight but I can remember times when they have been given out wrongly and walked off without a murmur of protest. When they play cricket they are usually what they would call “fair dinkum” which means straight and honest.

Still, there is a problem with DRS. It has sprinted ahead of the human capability. The TV umpires need more experience, the players need more restraint and the ICC, which sent two of its top guys to England to examine all the complaints on Wednesday, needs to keep its eyes wide open. The MCC world committee, packed with shrewd former captains, backed DRS recently because, it said, it gave more correct decisions.

One day, believe me, DRS will be perfect. Batsmen will praise it, bowlers will bless it and umpires will swear by it. One hundred per cent accuracy will be its minimum requirement and when improved cameras, better technicians and more skilful TV umpires take over it will be a boon to the whole game. Cricket heaven!

BCCI right

The Board of Control for Cricket in India was right when it decided to wait for the system to improve and perhaps the rest of the world should have waited too.

Instead they rushed in where angels feared to tread and now KP is furious, England’s fast bowler Graham Onions is having to swear there is not a strip of silicon tape in the whole of Durham when he would rather be perfecting his outswinger for use in the fourth Test on his home track at Chester-le-Street on Friday and, miracle of miracles, the Ashes series has burst into flames.

It’s not a gimmick to increase ticket sales because all the tickets were sold last winter but it is a talking point that will last until next autumn when for two months down under the whole Ashes thing is to be played again and, believe me, that will certainly not be dull.

In just six years, DRS has generated more heat, debate and controversy
than all the umpiring howlers in all the period of over a hundred
years that Cricket has been played. 1. The basic problem is that it
uses super technology which is rendered flawed and ineffective as the
final decisions are again 'human'. 2. Being human they are naturally
not consistent. With exactly the same evidence (or lack of it) one
decision is 'for' and another, 'against' the batsman. 3. Once the on
field Umpire gives a decision he does not overrule it even if the DRS
shows that he is wrong, when the decision is left to him (perhaps out
of pettiness, perhaps out of ego). The irony is that the players,
spectators and all TV viewers can see it but the Umpire refuses to see
it. 4. The old unwritten rule of the benefit of doubt going to the
batsman has been effectively buried under DRS. 5. It is proved and
accepted that 'technology' which DRS boasts of can be used also to
defeat the Hot Spot, viz Silicone tape. 6. In this series there are
more blunders than ever before, making the result lop sided and
unfair. 7. The worst of all: only 2 reviews per innings. Are the
Umpires likely to make only two or four mistakes in the course of a
150 over innings? Everyone knows the result but it cannot be
implemented merely because the mandatory 2 references are exhausted.
This is absurd. If the only purpose of introducing DRS is to eliminate
human errors, why not use it fully to eliminate all errors? Why tie
the players down helplessly with only 2 references when everyone can
see the error. The ICC should suspend the DRS until these and other
problems with it can be ironed out and all countries can accept it.

from:  N.S.Rajan
Posted on: Aug 9, 2013 at 07:44 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Columnists Listing


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in Ted Corbett

Ted Corbett.

ICC will have to look to the future

Ajmal’s ban may be the beginning of yet another major change, writes Ted Corbett »