The bigger the hero, the harder the fall, as in Lance Armstrong’s case, writes Nirmal Shekar
Anyone who can watch a film of Pele dummying the goalkeeper in the Mexico World Cup or Muhammad Ali beating Foreman in Zaire — anyone who can watch those things without tears in their eyes, without being moved in the same way as they are by a work of art is a philistine — there’s no other word for them. — Geoff Dyer in The Colour of Memory
EVEN more than the jaw-droppingly beautiful game of Roger Federer, the Michelangelo of tennis, even more than the gasp-inducing perfection of a Nadia Comaneci on the horizontal bar, even more than the bewitching beauty of a Shane Warne’s wizardry, it is raw courage in the face of extreme adversity that often moves you to tears in the world of sport.
For a long time, nothing brought tears to my eyes as readily as did Lance Armstrong’s story, his epic battle with cancer and his subsequent record-breaking conquest of an event, the Tour de France, that tests a man’s endurance much more than any other sporting spectacle. The American’s achievements seemed to be imbued with an emotional resonance unmatched in the world of sport. He became a universal symbol instead of being yet another great champion.
Shattering
But the recent turn of events — with the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency stripping Armstrong of his seven Tour titles following the champion cyclist’s decision not to challenge USADA’s doping allegations against him — have left me a shattered man. Somehow, I personally feel cheated after having wasted all those emotions on a man who may have been nothing more than a chemically-boosted uber-champion at best, and one of the greatest frauds in the history of modern sport, at worst.
And the tears I shed now are as much because of the moral outrage that I feel as because of memories that I hold of cancer victims I have interacted with; men and women who saw in Armstrong a hugely inspirational figure whose life helped them embolden themselves in their own fight against a disease that still seems to be a mystery to the best of science.
“You know, I am going to do an Armstrong,” said my dear friend and cricketer T. E. Srinivasan — who finally lost his courageous battle with malignant brain tumour two years ago. We were sitting at the pavilion of the Madras Cricket Club and talking everything but cricket.
I am glad T.E. did not live to see the shaming of his idol. He would have been devastated.
Hall of Shame
Every sport has its own Hall of Fame. It is a sort of temple where the game’s icons are enshrined so that their tall deeds may continue to be celebrated by posterity. In the world of cycling, nobody doubted where Armstrong’s place in the gallery of greats is. Now, it might be equally clear where his place in the game’s Hall of Shame is.
Armstrong, to be sure, is not a man to walk away from a fight. In the event, the fact that he has decided to give up fighting the allegations of doping levelled against him means that there may well be incontrovertible evidence of wrongdoing on his part.
How quickly great heroes come crashing down in front of our eyes time and again in the world of sport. And the bigger the hero, the harder the fall, as in Armstrong’s case.
Then again, in the world of sport, if success is magnified, then so is failure, particularly moral failure of the kind that Armstrong has been found guilty of. Although very few of us in this tainted world of ours may be qualified to pass moral judgements, one of the exquisite pleasures of being an ordinary citizen is in being able to label someone a villain at the first available opportunity.
For, in Armstrong’s case, everything that he stood out as an icon for — character, integrity, courage, a never-say-die spirit — has now become questionable in a morality play that is unlikely to end anytime soon.
As a champion who fought his way through an obstacle-strewn path, Armstrong’s life and career became so encrusted in myths that the real person became almost invisible. Even now he perhaps is, for many of his fans — and he himself — might still be in the denial mode.
Now it is obvious that the chutzpah that he wore as a protective amulet made sure that the dissonance between his public and private persona was well hidden from our eyes.
Eternal recurrence
But in this Nietzschean world of eternal recurrence, these things are bound to happen again and again and again. In an age of avarice when virtue is often of no value on the heady road to success, many a legend is bound to dismantle himself sooner than later.
Ben Johnson, Diego Maradona, Mike Tyson… just three of tens of dozens who have fallen from grace in modern times. Career-suicide may not be a chosen option, but it is likely to happen some day when a great star believes that the public perception of his character will protect him from almost anything.
As science advances, and prize money and rewards increase exponentially, the number of chemically-enhanced athletes would certainly increase. And all the smartness of the anti-doping officials may not help to bring every one of the wrongdoers to justice.
For all that, you still cannot take away from Armstrong what his foundation — which collected $500 million — has done for cancer survivors. But even those who have been benefited by his charity work would perhaps feel a bit let down.
Keywords: Lance Armstrong case



Just because Armstrong said he is not contesting the judgment against him it doesn't mean he has got something to hide. 500 dope test in 12 years and the man has never failed once. Suddenly one morning, USADA gathers some 'witnesses' and they say he doped. Commonsense suggests there is a story in that. It is 500 dope tests vs some witnesses, found by the USADA. It is highly unfortunate that Nirmal Shekar has succumbed to the stories against Armstrong fed to the media by the USADA, atleast Nirmal should have also considered Armstrong's side of the story. He too had a press release saying why he choose not to contest it.
I'm still surprised why a man of such incredible grit did not challenge allegations of moral wrong doing against him. It may in a way make people believe that the allegations are indeed true.
The author seems not to have read the reports closely. Admittedly, cycling is a
sport with a dark history as a look at the top 5 in every single race won by
Armstrong will reveal. With the exception of Lance and maybe 1-2 of the dozens,
every other one in those 7 years were found to have doped.
Yet! one must assume that one is innocent until proven guilty. And Lance
Armstrong has never failed a doping test yet! Maybe, he did dope, maybe yes, but
all those tests have never shown any traces of it and it is tragic that the USADA
should strip him of his titles without the clinching bit of evidence. It's like accusing
someone of murder when you don't even have the body of the victim or any
indication that there was a murder.
An article that's too early and too premature..
Sad to see this from the stables of The Hindu and especially from Mr.
Nirmal Shekar..
Time may prove your words, but then let it prove it first!!
With disappointment, an ardent fan of Mr. Shekar.. :(
You should think twice before you defame a person who has put his life
into the sport....
Disappointment Mt. Shekhar !! Such callous and presumptuous comments for a man of such a pragmatic and coherent attitude !! Without concrete evidences by the USADA, a delay for the thoughts would have been appreciated.
Didn't expect such an article from Nirmal Shekar. He should've read
the official statements of all parties involved and made his column.
Apart from going through Cancer, Lance has to go through a lot of
tests, to prove himself genuine year(s) round. I didn't expect a
respected writer, to come to conclusions based on hypothetical
allegations. Lance, chosing not to contest the decisions of the USADA
and instead chosing to spend his resources, both monetary and non-
monetary on his other more worthy endeavours, make him a bigger idol,
if he already isn't. I doubt if Nirmal has read Lance's accounts of
round the year availability for doping tests. When a man is questioned
of his integrity, repeatedly, Lance had wisely chosen to finally let
the USADA bark. People know who won those 7 titles. People who
competed alongside him. People who endured what he endured.
I think Mr.Shekar is jumping to conclusions without going into the
details. And he should be prepared to eat his words(and this entire
column}, in case developments happens the other way.
It is hard to believe how a man can cheat drug test during seven
championships and not be caught.
As Armstrong has accused USADA, it is a witch hunt against him.
Because Armstrong took the wise decision of not contesting the vindictive and unilateral decisions of the USADA does not mean that Armstrong is guilty. I did not expect a respected writer like Nirmal Shekar to condemn Armstrong based on the frivolous and non-callous allegations of the USADA.
a good article by Mr. Shekhar. Lance Armsrtong was, is and will be a legend to all the higher minds of the world. He'll be an inspiration for all of us. He imbibed in us the needed interest regarding the sport which was previously lost in the glory of others. Cudos to him.
Don't question a man just because USADA has said it. If you have read his book and I am sure you haven't he has already discussed about all this . He says that people in France and USA have been always opposed to him . He has never ever failed a test . Even after all this it seems that a witch-hunt has been going on against him. By posting such an article don't demean his achievements . Writing a few words is a lot easier than going there and achieveing something. He discusses in his book that people from anti-doping squads used to come up at any time ( he might be going out with his family , but if they turn up he has to be ready for the samples). All this takes a toll. Every person has a limit of patience. I think by stopping pursuing his defence he has accepted that some people are present in this world who will target you just for the sake of targetting. Many people have made careers out of maligning others while doing nothing in their own lives.
Sad to see how this column is completely written with many hypothesis.
Author should have referred official statement by Lance Armstrong. He have
repeatedly said that he's not accepting any allegations. He's simply
unwilling to keep on wasting his time proving his innocence. He haven't
failed a single doping test in 12 years. He never said no to any test or
trial still Travis T. Tygart of USADA gathered a group of people who swear
they saw Armstrong doping. There has been no trial, no due process, but in
the minds of many, that testimony outweighs the results of hundreds of drug
tests. People lie. Blood and urine usually don’t. And if they do, they don’t
lie 500 times. People do. Some lie that many times in a week. But okay.
Let’s assume these people really are witnesses, let’s assume they’re telling
the truth, and then let’s assume that their testimony is the new standard,
outweighing all drug test results.
Then what in the world is the point of drug testing?
Armstrong vs. Armstrong
Yet another superb article by Mr.Nirmal Shekar. While Neil Armstrong -
the 'First Moon Walk' hero who left us yesterday for good - will always
remain enshrined in our memories, Lance Armstrong will, from now on, be
remembered more for his descent into the 'Hell of Shame' from "Hall of
Fame'
I feel it's a little bit premature for the noted sports columnist to write about a legend...let alone hammer nails into the coffin of his glory.... Writting a column based on assumptions and media reports gleaned from newspapers and the Internet are not what writers and journos should be doing... Sorry, Mr Sekhar, you are on the wrong track...By assumption a certain Mr Kalmadi, Raja and gang are also clean and a Mammohan black, until proven otherwise.....
Assumptions don't make a solid ground for a certain show of skill over words and language...
Please Email the Editor