What the hell, we can do with a few illusions in life, can’t we? writes Nirmal Shekar
Almost all the sublimely enjoyable things in life tweak reality. In sport, no single event does this more successfully than does The Championships at Wimbledon. It is both a phenomenal achievement and a sleight of hand.
Yet, it serves the purpose. As the great Friedrich Nietzsche said, man cannot stand too much reality. “How much truth can the spirit take,” he bemoaned. To tell you the truth, not very much, unless a person wants to deliberately cross the line dividing the sane and the not-so-sane.
Then again, Wimbledon does not deliberately misrepresent reality. There is no conscious attempt on the part of the honourable men who run the event to do anything like this. It has just evolved to become what it is from its Victorian garden party roots.
While taking advantage of all that state-of-the-art technology has to offer — look at the marvel that is the Centre Court roof, for instance — Wimbledon still manages to retain its late 19th century aura.
The present is nothing but the accumulation of the past. But in almost all other great sporting events, the past is virtually obliterated. At Wimbledon, the past and the present coexist in a happily-ever-after union.
Some would choose to dismiss this as an illusion, at best, and romantic hogwash at worst. But what the hell, we can do with a few illusions in life, can’t we?
If life is a theatre of the absurd, as Albert Camus said, then Wimbledon surreptitiously draws a veil over the worst of everyday reality and replaces it with a different kind of theatre — one that has little in common with the dreariness of our 24/7 lives.
Like any number of other illusions we live with, the grand, awe-inspiring sporting spectacle at the All England Lawn Tennis Club is cloaked in make-believe. But it doesn’t hurt; instead it comes as a balm.
Finitude is a precondition of human value. All good things, and bad, come to an end. But Wimbledon, with its unmistakable gloss of gentility and high culture, seems to have been around for ever.
In an age when avarice is a virtue rather than a mortal sin, we lack the moral vocabulary to express our disgust at some of the events that pass for sport these days. Perhaps Wimbledon is the only event that manages to evoke ‘spiritual’ states akin to the finest of music.
The most profound emotions that sport evokes — rarely, to be sure — have as much to do with the ambience as with the skills of the performers.
This is precisely why, during my 25-plus trips to the spiritual home of tennis, it hardly mattered to me who the top seed was or even what the quality of the men’s and women’s line-ups were.
It did not matter if Bjorn Borg wasn’t around anymore. You did not lose sleep over Andre Agassi’s absence. This was England’s sporting emblem of undisputed supremacy and durability and the great names were only a minor part of the script.
The first time I walked in through Gate No.5., now called the Fred Perry Gate, I was over-dressed, over-awed and underprepared — emotionally and in every which way — for what awaited me.
On only the second day at Wimbledon, over 27 years ago, the late John Parsons, who was the Tennis Correspondent of The Telegraph for a long time and a friend and well-wisher for a much longer time, invited me to join a small group of journalists who were to discuss the quality of media facilities with a core group of the All England Lawn Tennis Club members.
Used to working in T-shirts and jeans until then, this correspondent rushed to Oxford Street the next morning to pick up a decent pair of trousers, a jacket and a tie. The exercise was well worth it.
The gentlemen of the committee were courteous, generous and made sure that a man visiting the hallowed inner chambers for the first time, someone from an entirely different continent and culture, was made to feel at home.
There was a minor problem though. One of my hosts offered me a glass of Sherry — and a few more — and it did take a long cold shower and two strong cups of coffee to get to the Centre Court for the match that afternoon.
Of course, those days, play on Centre Court did not start before 2 p.m. Pretty civilised, you would think.
Keywords: All England Lawn Tennis Club, Wimbledon



Rightly or wrongly,Wimbledon is synonymous with Nirmal Shekar for us for a number of years.More than the sport,what we enjoyed was your description of the happenings.We were not concerned who played or won.We wanted to read how Nirmal Shekar explained the event.The very first sentence in yesterday's writing capture the essentials of the nature of your writing.You tweaked reality with words the way a magician does with his wand and Wimbledon was transformed a sublimely enjoyable spectacle for us by your pen.A sport and sportsmen who took part in it took on the form of parables that told us what life after all was,what victory or loss meant to the sportsmen and to the public as well,what the pinnacle of sport was and what the fall of a sportsman told us.We have known many writers and many poets from your quote and the quotes always dealt with aspects of life that brought us down to reality ,though too much reality human race cannot stand
At Wimbeldon,it is tradition and modern, mix,the right way,from players,officials to ball boys.No one need to be reminded that you are at sacred place.Tennis,and tennis alone is bigger than players,and the biggest ego,knows his or her place.Long live Wimbeldon.You can bad mouth the English,but you can not take away their sense of duty,I remember,Lord Horotio Nelson,saying on the eve of Trafflegar"England expects every man to do his duty"I have nothing to offer'Except blood,toil and tears'England is the land of 'Magna Carta and Shakespere.I'm proud to have known English and England.
@Sharma
Nirmal Shekar Sir often quotes Nietzsche.
In fact after reading one of his article ten years ago on Sampras that
started with a Nietzsche quote "The higher you soar,the smaller you
appear to those who cannot fly",I changed the way I look at my life.
Incidentally that was about Sampras winning his last US open in his
thirties.
Nirmal Shekar is a truly great writer who imbibed the love of sport in
many people like me.Sir,waiting for your article on Roger's 17.
I have been a fan of NS writing for the past few years and I usually
enjoy reading his articles for the emotion it invokes from the reader
with its rich prose and flowing content. But of late NS seems to have
lost something very important that a writer must possess. A genuine
interest to convey something to the readers. Most of the recent
articles from NS seem more an exercise in pontificating with refined
vocabulary on random thoughts that, I am afraid , are only interesting
to himself and not majority of the readers. This happens to many fine
writers who begin to take themselves a bit too seriously. I hope in
future NS does not pontificate without intent and certainly not
prejudiced.
The writer fails to mention what exactly makes Wimbledon so surreal.
After reading the whole article, we only have his word for it, and not
a single supporting fact has emerged.
I used to keenly follow up NS's coverage on Wimbledon events over the
years. This year as well was no exception. Just like he felt that it's
the aura and the grandeur of the center court that bewitched him
rather than the stature of the players or the matches, I am
invariably spellbound by the way NS intricately construct the events
there regardless the ultimate results there.
Kudos to Nirmal for creating such a concise yet impeccable work out
and sincerely hope you'll be hanging around there in the long years to
come in the vicinity of the center court with the very burning passion
enthusiasm of a young man some 27 years ago which we could see through
your lines so far.
What's your point, NS? I believe you should consider writing simpler language so that the entire reader-base can figure out what you are trying to share with us. I might not be well-equipped with litrary arsenal to tear through the gloss to really understand the content, and I am not ashamed of it! But I am literate enough to understand everyday English to make sense out of it. I hope that next time, when I invest 5-10 minutes reading something written by NS, it adds some knowledge to me. This one was a bouncer, and I am no Sachin.
Mr. Menon, take a chill-pill dude :-P
A wonderful eulogy on perhaps the only divine sporting event. A one to be read again and again. And the very first comment by a fellow reader is an absolute irritant, though. If someone is incapable of comprehending a finely written piece, he or she should either admit it, or just move on.
Nirmal Shkekhar himself has quoted Nietzsche a couple of times in the
last 6 or 7 years.
i have always maintained that NS articles are eloquent and romantic but prejudiced. "In an age when avarice is a virtue rather than a mortal sin, we lack the moral vocabulary to express our disgust at some of the events that pass for sport these days"... another chance to bash IPL!
I, for the first time, read an Indian daily where somebody quoted
Nietzsche. Comforting.
From my student days way back in the mid fifties- when I heard the name Wimbledon for the first time in our College,annual(after) dinner quiz,the question being who won the Wimbledon in 1954 - Wimbledon has held me spell bound.The aura has not diminished till now when I am past 75 summers.From the days of reading The Hindu the morning after to know the result,through the days of listening to radio commentary eagerly how Ashe beat Connors in 1975 - a sight surprising to my wife and kids-to the days of watching black and white TV telecast of 1981 classic and surprising my host by cheering for McEnroe, to the present age colour TV HD telecasts I have come a long way but the aura of the event has not faded.In Phoenix,Arizona,this morning I must have given a surprise to my daughter in law by watching the show early on a Sunday morning.
It was Federer who won but it was I who was basking in the glory,unsure if I will be around next season.NirmalShekar's article
was a perfect end to my day!
The article is poorly written. The writer just shows off that he has a good Vocabulary and missed what he wanted to convey.
Please Email the Editor