Collectives help rural women ‘Lean In’

Women build social capital through the process of regular group meetings and this directly results in a change in their status, both within the home and community

September 30, 2015 02:22 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:37 pm IST

The real and sustained benefit of women’s collectives and their impact could instead lie in the improvement in the status of women that they could catalyse. Photo: Arunangsu Roy Chowdhury

The real and sustained benefit of women’s collectives and their impact could instead lie in the improvement in the status of women that they could catalyse. Photo: Arunangsu Roy Chowdhury

In the world of >microfinance , women’s collectives have acquired a great deal of prominence globally and are known by various names such as Self Help Groups (SHGs), Joint Liability Groups (JLG), or Village Saving and Loan Associations (VSLA). There is a strongly held belief that the formation of these groups has transformed the lives of women, improving their financial status due to the direct links between the >microcredit , obtained through the group, and the livelihood activities financed by this credit.

Nachiket Mor

A standardised, product-led approach is completely inconsistent with the power of finance which, at its core, is a service that is capable of infinite customisation and reducing the volatility that is unique to each customer’s life. This is exactly the kind of service that bankers even today offer companies and ultra-rich individuals, but for some reason a product-led Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) approach pervades the retail financial services industry. Fortunately, there are challengers to this world view (such as the Kshetriya Gramin Financial Services [KGFS] literally, “Regional Rural Financial Services”) that are emerging, and expectations are that, with refinement, they will become the dominant model of retail financial services.

Power of together So then, why collectivise? The real and sustained benefit of women’s collectives and their impact could instead lie in the improvement in the status of women that they could catalyse. The principal benefit of the association with the microcredit movement may simply have been to provide an acceptable, even if high cost, raison d’être and compulsion for these women to form collectives and meet regularly. This phenomenon of “regular meetings” appears to be an important enabling force which gives the woman courage to “lean in”, in multiple household and community settings.

Researchers find that woman’s groups, practising “participatory learning and action” in settings as varied as Bangladesh, India, Malawi, and Nepal, showed a 49 per cent reduction in maternal mortality and a 33 per cent reduction in neonatal mortality. Yet another randomised control trial found that, after just two years of an intervention, which combined a group-based microfinance programme with participatory training on understanding HIV infection, gender norms, domestic violence, and sexuality, the risk of past-year physical or >sexual violence by an intimate partner was reduced by more than half. Women who had gone through the programme were able “to challenge the acceptability of violence, expect and receive better treatment from partners, leave abusive relationships, and raise public awareness about intimate partner violence”.

An examination of the factors that generate this impact finds that women do not come with a ready-made stock of social capital but instead build it through the process of regular group meetings and it is this social capital that directly results in their change of status, both within the home and community. A field experiment in urban India found that groups in which women met more often and therefore had greater social interaction, showed persistent “improvements in informal risk-sharing and reductions in default” relative to groups that met less frequently. Research suggests that groups tend to generate social capital through the “focussed” interactions that occur in “encounters”, i.e., group meetings, which have a number of features, including: (i) a single focus of attention; (ii) intense and open discussions among group members; (iii) the huddle of the group meeting around the group leader with frequent eye contact; (iv) peer monitoring; and (v) the rituals of song and dress that surround the group meetings, all of which produce a strong feeling of “solidarity and corresponding flow of emotions”. This is a very different understanding of social capital and how it is generated among women and suggests why the manner in which groups actually operate is far more important than the original purpose for which they were formed or even perhaps the manner in which they are created.

This aspect of collectives and groups merits greater attention and understanding in our quest to find robust pathways for empowerment of women.

( Nachiket Mor is a Chennai-based economist. He can be reached at nachiket@nachiketmor.net)

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.