Blair ignored Parliament, Iraq probe told

February 03, 2010 12:11 am | Updated December 15, 2016 04:29 am IST - LONDON

Britain's former International Development Secretary Clare Short, leaves after giving evidence at a hearing of the Iraq Inquiry, at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London on Tuesday. Photo: AP.

Britain's former International Development Secretary Clare Short, leaves after giving evidence at a hearing of the Iraq Inquiry, at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London on Tuesday. Photo: AP.

Clare Short, who resigned from the government in protest over the Iraq invasion and now sits in the Commons as an independent MP, on Tuesday accused the former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, of treating Parliament as a “rubber stamp” to get its backing for the invasion.

Giving evidence before the Iraq inquiry, Ms. Short, who was Secretary of State for International Development at the time, said Mr. Blair and his “mates” took all the crucial decisions relating to the invasion, ignoring the Cabinet and Parliament.

“Everything was done on a wing and a prayer,” she said.

A five-member committee, chaired by John Chilcot, a retired civil servant, is conducting the inquiry aimed at learning “lessons” from the Iraq invasion.

Ms. Short’s evidence came amid reports that Mr. Blair may be recalled by the committee to reconcile “inconsistencies” in his testimony last week. These are said to relate to the then Attorney-General Lord Goldsmith’s advice on the legality of the war.

Ms. Short, who resigned two months after the invasion, said she was “shocked” by Lord Goldsmith’s advice that the war was legal.

Initially, Lord Goldsmith had doubts about its legality without a second U.N. resolution authorising military action but days before the invasion he gave it the go-ahead, allegedly under pressure from the Blair administration.

She said that in light of the facts that had since emerged about Lord Goldsmith’s “doubts and his changes of opinion”, she believed that the Cabinet was misled.

“I think for the Attorney-General to come and say there’s unequivocal legal authority to go war was misleading.”

“I think he misled the Cabinet. He certainly misled me, but people let it through,” she said describing the invasion as “historically inaccurate”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.