Simplifying the hunt for Goldilocks's bed

The search for exoplanets is made interesting by the spotting of Goldilocks, or habitable, zones, regions in space that could support life. A simple calculator to model these zones was proposed by a team from the University of Washington, and it throws up some curious results.

February 05, 2013 02:29 pm | Updated November 10, 2021 10:02 am IST

This is a blog post from

A bunch of scientists from the University of Washington have put together a habitable-zone (i.e., >Goldilocks zone ) calculator [ >link to HTML page ] on FORTRAN, and I'm really kicked about it. You can find the FORTRAN code >here *, and a pre-print copy of their paper >here . In fact, the work's been accepted to the Astrophysical Journal.

Anyway, the calculator's a great thing because putting in a few numbers is all that's needed to throw up possibly useful and interesting insights into how habitable zones (HZ) are created around a star. At the moment, the input values required are effective temperature of the star and the stellar luminosity in solar units.

The effective temperature of a body is defined as the temperature of a blackbody that emits the same quantity of electromagnetic radiation as does the body. Many objects, like our Sun, emit different kinds of radiation - such as ultraviolet, X-ray, and gamma - because of different processes associated with them. In such cases, it becomes difficult to say what the temperature of the body is at some point in space and time.

The easier workaround is to think in terms of temperature, and figure out how hot or cold another body would have to be to be emitting the same /amount/ of radiation. The Sun's effective temperature is 5,780 K.

The stellar luminosity is a measure of the star's brightness. Basically, it's a product of the star's effective temperature and its surface area. To make matters simpler, our Sun is taken to be a benchmark of sorts, and its stellar luminosity is 1 solar unit.

The output values are the recent Venus limit, the runaway greenhouse limit, the water-loss limit, the max. greenhouse limit, and the early Mars limit (all measured in astronomical units - AUs).

1. The early Venus limit is the distance at which an Earth-like planet develops a Venus-like climate around a star like our Sun. The HZ closest to the star is assumed to lie beyong this point.

2. The runaway greenhouse limit is the distance at which the greenhouse effect is dominant on the planet with the oceans evaporating away entirely.

3. The water-loss limit is the distance at which the upper stratosphere of the planet becomes saturated with water vapour - this is a prerequisite for habitability.

4. The maximum greenhouse limit is the distance at which the planets has a greenhouse effect going that completely traps all infrared radiation in the atmosphere.

5. The early Mars limit is the distance at which a planet develops a Mars-like climate around a star like our Sun. The HZ closest to the star is assumed to lie before this point.

So, plug in different values into the calculator and see for yourself what different conditions persist around a star at different distances.

Model

Moist greenhouse

Runaway greenhouse

Maximum greenhouse

Mars-sized planet (S.G. = 3.73 m/s 2 )

1.035 AU

1.033 AU

1.72 AU

Earth

0.99 AU

0.97 AU

1.70 AU

Super-Earth (S.G. = 25 m/s 2 )

0.94 AU

0.92 AU

1.67 AU

pCO 2 = 5.2 x 10 -3 bar

1.00 AU

0.97 AU

-

pCO 2 = 5.2 x 10 -2 bar

1.02 AU

0.97 AU

-

pCO 2 = 5.2 x 10 -1 bar

1.02 AU

0.97 AU

-

pCO 2 = 5.2 bar

0.99 AU

0.97 AU

-

(Table from pre-print paper)

Here, S.G. is the surface gravity of the planet (Earth's S.G. is 9.81 m/s 2 ); pCO 2 is the amount of pressure that an atmosphere composed only of carbon dioxide would exert on the ground.

Here are some interesting plots from the paper.

OLR v. Wavenumber

A plot of the OLR (outgoing long-wave radiation) against the wavenumber (number of waves - one crest + one trough - per cm) for a water-loss limit modeled using the calculator - It shows a >strong absorption (the downward peak) at around 675 per cm. (Image from pre-print paper)

T eff v. Flux

The distances of different recently discovered exoplanets are plotted on a "space-map" in which the habitable zone has been plotted using the calculator. Note that this map is said to accounted for stars of different sizes and effective temperatures. (Image from pre-print paper)

(HD 40307g, which sits smack in the middle of the HZ belt, is located 42 light-years away in the direction of the constellation Pictor.)

Planet mass v. Flux

Another interesting plot, this shows the "preferred" mass of a planet that lies in the HZ with some effective incident stellar flux (the amount of energy entering the planet's atmosphere from the star). The window is divided into three parts, with each indicating the kind of star that must be needed for a planet of some mass to be habitable. (Image from pre-print paper)

Interestingly, for an effective temperature between 4,000 K and 4,500 K, you'll notice that the values of the runaway greenhouse limit and the water-loss limit are almost identical! In other words, and the implication is that, there is a fine line between when stratospheric saturation occurs and when the oceans start to vaporise. This line is determined by the distance of an Earth-like planet from a Sun-sized star that's 69-78% as hot as our Sun is.

*Note: Per the request of the authors, please acknowledge the following papers if you're using the code or the calculator:

Kopparapu et al. (2012), Habitable Zones around Main-sequence stars: New Estimates. Submitted to Astrophysical Journal.

Ramirez et al. (2012), Greenhouse and Anti-greenhouse Effects in Dense CO2-CH4 and CO2-H2 Atmospheres AND Implications for the Habitable Zone. Submitted to Icarus.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.