It could be said that every citizen of India, can justifiably take pride in possessing a rare structure in Mullaperiyar Dam, the very first created in the country, perhaps in the world, for trans-basin diversion of water for beneficial use, towards the end of the 19th century, still continuing to serve with its benefits undiminished, through continuous surveillance, maintenance and management by the Tamil Nadu government.
The credit for the concept, design and construction of the Mullaperiyar Dam should go mainly to two British Engineers Major Ryves, the District Engineer of Madurai District, who gave a practical form in 1862 for diversion of Periyar waters to benefit the drought-prone areas of the then Madurai and Ramanathapuram districts and Colonel J. Pennycuick, who not only made a report with detailed estimates for the Mullaperiyar Dam in 1882 but also ventured against all odds in the most inhospitable dense forest, struggling with single-minded devotion for a good cause and completed the structure in 1895.
Just to the west of the Vaigai river basin in Tamil Nadu, on the other side of the Western Ghat ridges, lies the Periyar basin in the Kerala State. The river Periyar, as the name implies, is the one which drains the largest catchment among the west-flowing rivers of the Kerala state.
The river Periyar rises in the Sivagiri peak of the Western Ghats in the Quilon district, 80 km south of Devikulam, at an elevation of about 2,400 m and traverses through the stiff cliffs and dense forests for about 186 km, where the tributary Mullaiyar joins on the right at about an elevation of 850 m. The river then turns west, cuts through the hills in a deep narrow gorge at about 11 km below Mullaiyar junction. It is this narrow gorge in sound hard rock that gave an excellent formation that was chosen by Col. Pennycuick to construct the Mullaperiyar gravity masonry dam. The river Periyar runs through 232 km traversing the taluks of Peermedu and Devikulam and parts of Ernakulam district before draining into the well-known Vembanad lake.
The Madras government entered into correspondences with the erstwhile Travancore government in possession of the territory where the dam was to be built from 1862. The Travancore government, which originally showed interest in launching the Mullaperiyar dam project as a joint project, later pulled out of the joint project suggestions and, by a letter dated October 24, 1873 to the British Resident, offered to accept a sum of Rs. 75,000/- per year from 1882 as lease rent for the site of the reservoir, which was later surveyed to extend over 8,000 acres, and agreed to demise the entire water to be stored therein in favour of the government of Madras. The Lease Deed of 1886, to take retrospective effect from January 1, 1886 between the governments of Travancore and Madras, was finally signed on October 29, 1886 for lease of land for the project works for diversion of the waters to then Madras Presidency.
The argument put forth by the present government of Kerala that the British Government got the inter-state agreement signed exercising their supremacy falls flat with the recorded evidence.
Among the materials of construction, Stone, the principal constituent of the dam, was locally available to be quarried as was the sand in the river. But lime and surki for the mortar, designed as three parts of sand, two of lime and one of surki, had to be transported through dense forests besides several construction equipment, and other materials from the temporary camp at Thekkadi, 13 km off, on the other side of the Ghat.
Five different methods of conveyance were considered, all expensive and difficult to organise including a ropeway across the valley and that which was convenient at the time was adopted.
It should be specifically mentioned that throughout this decade of construction, great effort was taken to ensure the quality of the materials used and the building of the structures through tests, checks and supervision.
As cement had not made its advent in India when the project had been designed and executed, lime surki mortar was used with the lime having been burnt to specification in kiln at site and well ground by a battery of bullock-drawn circular mills and surki being ground to the fineness required by crushers. We are now able to see the result in the dam structure retaining water up to 152 ft. above the river bed for more than a century, with minimum seepage well below the limits prescribed, in spite of the fact that no drilling and grouting was done for consolidation and no drainage gallery was formed in the body of the dam, since both these were unknown practices at that period of time.
On May 29, 1970, the government of Madras signed two supplemental agreements with the government of Kerala, as successors in interest to the original Lease Deed of 1886. By one supplemental agreement, the annual lease rent was enhanced and the fishing rights in the Periyar lake was relinquished in favour of the government of Kerala. By another agreement which came into effect from November 13, 1954, the government of Madras would generate hydro power and pay to the government of Kerala for the electrical energy generated at Rs.12/- KW (kilo watt) year up to 350 million units and at Rs.18/- KW year beyond 350 million units. This will prove that the Mullaperiyar project has been beneficial to both Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
The safety of the dam is now being questioned, just because it is 116 years in age and a fear psychosis has been raised, which gives the impression it may burst any time. No gravity masonry dam will ever burst and no gravity dam has so far burst in any part of the world. The dam is as good as a new dam after the strengthening measures devised by the Central Water Commission, the highest technical body in the government of India, have been carried out that too with the concurrence of the engineers of the Government of Kerala at every stage.
As one closely associated with this dam and the strengthening measures undertaken, I am pained to see the controversies being raised on its safety, in spite of the wise opinion given by several experts who have inspected the dam and the Supreme Court having accepted the opinion of the experts.
(A. Mohanakrishnan, who has been handling inter-state river water issues on behalf of the Tamil Nadu government, is advisor (water resources) to the government.)





Comments:
I may concede to an extent that the dam is safe but to say its as good as new is just too far fetched.
Based on the history how can a person judge the
strength of the dam? it has to be analysed through scientific methods.
Does the author mean that the dam was leaking right from the day it was constructed? W
Can the author please let us know how many 116 year old gravity dams are there in the world to make a statement like no gravity dam will ever burst?
Seems to be a biased report in favor of Tamil Nadu. No man
made object lives or stays for ever.Some of his statements
appear fanatical.
How much is the "minimum seepage well below the limits prescribed",
Mr.Mohana Krishnan? Please be factual.
Respected Advisor,
The title caught my eye and I was eager to understand the evidences behind such
a bold claim. However, while you have provided detailed references and dates of
how the dam was built and the negotiations with the kerala government regarding
the leasing of the dam and its resources, you have not provided the same level
of detail to explain the title of the article - merely one paragraph of claims
with no references to names, dates and studies.
AJ.
This article provides solid facts to prove that the existing structure remains solid as rock. Still we can wait till the Supreme Court appointed committee publishes its findings. Moreover as civilized citizens we have to think if a British Collector could empathize for people living in drought struck land why can't we? Also Supreme Court committee should investigate how far the resort lobby of Kerala has influenced or stirred the violence on the other end.
Mr. Mohankrishnan has spent the whole article describing the historic facts about the dam but curiously touches the core issue of the current stability of the dam only in the last paragraph. I find it amusingly similar to replies given by any politician who has no in depth knowledge of an issue. It is ludicrous to see that people with so little technical knowledge are advising governments of issue which affect lakhs of people.
Dear Mr. Mohanakrishnan, Thank you for sharing your opinion. But we
would like to hear from a more neutral expert. Also I would also like
to hear your opinion on whats happening in Kudankulam. My position is
any project that risks the lives of a large number of people must go
through thorough scrutiny by multiple expert committees(periodically).
May be as a rational being you should also be advising the TN
politicians to stop milking this issue and create enmity between the
people of our two states(as far as i am aware they called harthal in 5
districts in tn, started an economic blockade and showed black flag
during a PMs visit. FYI no such overreaction happened in our state
despite allegation by your politicians.). By completely ignoring the
peoples fears as irrelevant they are just adding fuel to fire.
regards and Happy New Year,
A concerned Malay
Mr. Mohanakrishnan has written a good article on the basic history behind the Mullaperiyar dam, and the agreements signed between various authorities and governments. What he has failed to do is a critical analysis of the safety issues, whether genuinely or not, the Government of Kerala and the people residing downstream of the dam have raised. For example, Mr. Mohanakrishnan has not mentioned how many gravity masonry dams are there in the world, how old are they, the nature and composition of materials used in those dams, and most importantly if any of those dams are located in a seismically active area as the Mullaperiyar dam is. Without such vital information Mr. Mohanakrishnan is making a statement that "No gravity masonry dam will ever burst and no gravity dam has so far burst in any part of the world". I am not sure what kind of divine authority Mr. Mohanakrishnan has to make such a bold statement.
Kumar Rajappan, San Diego, CA
For Tamilnadu, Kudankulam, which is using the latest technology is a safety risk.But 116 year old surki dam with 11.5 tmc water which is situating in an earthquake prone area is as safe as a new one. At present Mullapperiyar is in the 3rd zone for seismic activity. by 2015 it move to the 4th. So are you saying that it can withstand an earthquake of 7.5 mag.The kerala govt. is assuring the same amount of water which is getting today.Then why Tamilnadu is not considering the construction of a new dam. .
An excellent analysis by an expert in the domain should help to educate all. Congratulations to The Hindu for publishing such informative articles. When Supreme court is seized of the matter, why politicians of Kerala, irrespective of political affiliations have ventured on this adventurous path of creating panic among their people? While the earlier Marxist regime is guilty of passing an Act to annul the Supreme Court of Order to allow Tamilnadu to increase the water level, the present Congress government for obvious political reasons has steadfastly been acting in bipartisan manner. .
An excellent analysis by an expert in the domain should help to educate all. Congratulations to The Hindu for publishing such informative articles. When Supreme court is seized of the matter, why politicians of Kerala, irrespective of political affiliations have ventured on this adventurous path of creating panic among their people? While the earlier regime in Kerala was guilty of passing an Act to annul the Supreme Court Order to allow Tamil Nadu to increase the water level, the present Congress government for obvious political reasons has steadfastly been acting in a bipartisan manner. It is high time that President's Rule is enforced on Kerala and the general public of both the states are saved from the fallout of such gimmicks.
Hindu is doing a great job in furthering an informed debate on
Mullaperiyar issue. This is what is needed right now if some sanity
has to prevail. This structure has to be treated as a heritage
structure and preserved rather than brought down based on fallacies.
Our civil engineering and architect should study the structure and use
it for furthering their knowledge of construction. We have come to
think that only RCC and cement structures are safe and sound which is
far from the truth. This dam will stand for another 400 years and
beyond if maintained optimally. There is great ecological sense in
maintaining this dam rather than trying to build another dam. Kerala
people pride themselves in being literate and more informed than rest
of country and they should inform themselves rather than get carried
away by rhetoric and fear.
Does any of the heroics of the past add to the
strength of this dam. Did same British Engineers who had designed and
built the dam give 999 years life for this dam. Being in some coveted
government position do not qualify people to write any thing like
this. First of all, every one has to accept that safety of life is of
prime importance. Hence due to any one factor affecting the safety, if
people living downstream the dam believe that their life is at stake,
the case need to be studied by experts, not politicians and government
secretaries.
The problem with the above analysis is that it is entirely based on
the nostalgic belief - "Old is gold". The part missing in the entire
discourse is the possibility of the the dam being unstable due to
increased tectonic activity (aka earthquakes) & visible cracks in the
structure.
Do take note that there are lives are risk ..
We can all find "experts" of all hue & colour willing to mouth
anything, but can i understand why the option of a new dam to replace
an 116 yr old structure without cement or steel so un acceptable?
Further, why is that tamilnadu politicians obsessed with water issues
with all its neigbouring states- kerala, karnataka & andhra
Kudos to Mr Mohanakrishnan for bringing out a historical time-line regarding the dam issue. However, as some readers have pointed out here, fears have risen in the minds of some people in Kerala about the safety of the dam. It is precisely to verify whether this dam could withstand any future seismic activity, the Supreme Court has nominated a technical committee. Let us wait for the committee's report and not jump to any other conclusions. Until such time, it is better to keep rhetoric out of this discussion.
Sri.A.Mohanakrishnan is a retired Chief engineer from Tamilnadu PWD and Adviser to T.N.government For interstate waters during DMK and ADMK govts and his write up has to be favouring TN cause But Ramaswamy Iyer who wrote earlier on this subject was a secretary in water resource ministry government of India,whose write up seems unbiased and touching points of both states.
We should have an independend expert opinion on the dam safety. Alternatively, Mr. Mohanakrishnan should be appointed for a limited period as advisor to the Kerala Govt. and then seek his opinion and see whether he changes his views when he comes to this side of the dam. People of both the states want an amicable settlement. In the absence of independent , credible technical opinion, people are not able to form their views.
If "No gravity masonry dam will ever burst" then why isn't every dam made using this technology? Please support your statements with facts.
Dear Editor So far you have published the views of those who belong to some political institution, so there is large possibility of these articles to be biased. I want to know the view from the experts and also from the 'reputed' newspaper of national status like The Hindu.
Please do note add more information in this matter , this is an ego clash between two groups who call them self as Indians. Be an Indian the matter can be solved easily instead of creating a rift among people.
@SN Iyer Mr.Durai Murugan does not know the rank of John Pennycuick, Mr. Mohanakrishnan's statement is fanatical. Why can't You do your home work properly before slinging accusations at those with hands-on experience in Periyar Dam maintenance. Mr. Mohanakrishnan never said Periyar Dam will stay for ever. Even the Great Wall of China will not stay for ever. My thanks and appreciations to Hindu for presenting the facts, myths, knowledge and ignorance surrounding the Periyar Dam and leaving it to the readers to sift grain from chaff. Kindly publish the articles of experts from Kerala before closing this series.
The very fact that the author is holding an advisory position with Govt of TN, nullifies the effects of his 'non-partisan conclusion'. Further interestingly, I witnessed and wondered the ferocity with which TN hav been raising the issue of Koodankulam citing possibility of mass destruction. Anyways, a strong believer of federal structure, I can understand the insecurity of TN as regards the water availability to TN, post the construction of a new dam. Add to it the TN-disadvantaged revenue model such a new arrangement would involve. Water is indeed a state subject and its the states which would have to find an ultimate panacea. However,I strongly believe that the political parties in Kerala needs to be a bit more firm and assertive in pushing such precarious agenda as they do with all earnest, when it comes to initiating a 'trivial issue based strike' every other week in the state, thereby crippling its economy. A crippled economy loses its negotiating acumen. I hope we learn soon.
Rs 12 per KW year !!...this must be the cheapest of the cheapest electric power tariff paid in the entire world. What a ridiculous low rate. It is extremely unfair to Kerala in all respects and should be reviewed by order of the Supreme Court. How much does the Tamil Nadu government charge its consumers in Chennai and elsewhere?. Rs 6 / KW hour or more. That is Rs 53,000 appox per KW Year. The other point which is to be noted is that the TN government pays Kerala Rs 75,000 per TMC of water while it pays Andhra Govt Rs 3 Crores per TMC. The writer has been a bit non-objective in his content preparation.
All the readers who have opposed this article have missed an important point. There has been several technical reports about the stability of the dam, something that was acknowledged by the Supreme Court itself. So Mr. Mohanakrishnan need not be relied upon to provide any technical proof - it has already been done. One question - if the MP dam is in an earthquake prone area, why does Kerala want to build another dam that is close to the existing one - is that area free of sesimic tremors ? In fact the Idukku dam has seen more tremors in the recent past and that's why Kerala has reduced the its storage to half. So applying the same logic, can we bulldoze the Idukki dam also ? Lastly to answer Mr Hari Sivan, TN is unfortnately bereft of any big rivers, so it is left at the mercy of Karnataka and Kerala. If TN had their own Cauvery starting from the Eastern ghats, no one would bother about fighting for water.
[1] At first let me reiterate the FACT that neither the people nor any politicians in Kerala is against giving the waters from Periyar to TN, rather it's our need too, to have food/vegetables to be sourced from >TN at a lesser price than we get those from Karnataka/Andhra. [2] Regarding the agitations against the MP dam in Kerala, the FACT is that it has never been a political issue or being supported by any political party, until the increasing earthquakes in the recent few years started pouring intense fear among the people living downstream. And to further the situation, there had been more than a dozen tremors (even up to 3.5 & 4.2) in the past few months which aroused panic among the people and unleashed state-wide protests against the inaction of the government, even after knowing that this is an issue of existence of millions of people.
I find it surprising that a national newspaper like the Hindu should allow the publishing of such an article. No engineer in his right mind would say that a gravity dam is infallible. Just because there have not been any dam collapses doesn't mean it may not happen. The fears of the people of Kerala are genuine even though the politicians at both ends managed to mess things up. Even if one life is lost because of the bias that exists now who would be able to give it back. Why can't a solution that both parties can agree on be proposed? When the Kerala government is willing to give the same amount of water as before what's wrong with a new dam?
Hi, I am not a Civil Engineer to criticaly analyse the Dam related data. But I can tell that it (or any dam) will not stand for many years... especially with changing geology. What assumptions on geology were during Dam construction ? Are they still holding ? Now let the problem be aside... How long will the DAM hold? When is a severe eatrhquake predicted? (No one knows for sure.. only probabalistic models exists.. ) ---- My question to politicians --- Instead of going for and against Dam construction.. why not try to retain the agreement and construct new one ?
This article lacks in-depth technical data or argument, but it is presented accurately from the point of view of the author, in his position. Some people seem to worry about seepage. Seepage is an intrinsic part of any dam construction and does not compromise the strength of the structure. Visit any dam in the world and you will find cracks too, not just seepage and conduits for seepage water. The confidence in gravity dams expressed is not ill placed. By design, gravity dams work very well, and since there is no wear and tear of any magnitude affecting the mass of the structure (the mass is what acts to counter the force of the water), we should be able to place enough confidence in it from any engineering perspective taken into consideration while constructing it. It is not a constantly weakening structure either! Extreme seismic activity of a nature not seen in 116 years will leave us with consequences far larger than the bursting of a dam.
Is it true that the real purpose of Kerala Government wanting to remove the Periyar Dam is to divert the water to the Idukki Dam, which at present is not receiving sufficient waters and is operating at much below its capacity? Is it also true that the new location proposed for the Periayar Dam is downstream to the existing Dam and at a height of about 1850 feet above MSL, whereas the existing Periyar Dam is at a height of over 2850 feet above MSL and is it true that it is technically impossible for the authorities to provide the same amount of water to the TN even if they genuinely wanted to? I request that someone responsible clarify these matters in the public domain.
It is really unfortunate that 'The Hindu' a paper I hold in high esteem is publishing only opinions from senior Tamilnadu politicians and experts from Tamilnadu. Every so called truth has two sides. It is very important that the paper publish opinions also from senior politicians from Kerala as well experts from Kerala. The readers of 'The Hindu' deserves to be well informed.
Both camps in the Mullaperiyar issue are expected to come up with articles highlighting their view points. News organizations should serve as a platform for publishing those views. However, that doesn't mean they can skirt the responsibility of weeding out articles with baseless claims.
However many times the argument is put forth stating that the dam is safe, kerala is not going to accept it. What they started 30 years before they want that to end in their favor. Kerala is benefitting many ways from TN but cannot digest sharing water with TN.
A highly biased article. Not that one in favor of Kerala would be more welcome, but the larger intent of the article is contrary to the title and to the neutral journalistic spirit that which should be upheld by an institution of such stature as the Hindu!
The Hindu seems to be biased towards Tamil Nadu. The claim that the dam is as good as new is ridiculous. Claims should be based on scientific facts and not historic facts.
Can anyone tell the reliable lifetime of a concrete structure. Will it be more than 100 years?. the strength of Lime surky mixture is only 1/6 of concrete. How the strength of the dam can assured by describing the history of the dam and the agreement?
Whilst Mr. Mohanakrishnan has spoken at length about the history of the Dam, lets face the real issue of what problem does TN have, if Kerala accepts to construct a new dam in the place of the old dam, at its own cost, and accepts to provide the same quantity of water to TN as per the existing practice. I would think instead of unnecessarily politicising the issue, the TN government should look at the issue pragmatically and think about "WILL IT STAND TO LOSE IF A NEW DAM IS BUILT?" The frequent hartals / bandhs etc. in the neighbouing districts of both states have resulted in unnecesary tensions between the states and the opportunity cost of these events would probably more than the cost of a new dam!!!
It is extremely sad to see such unscientific, medieval approach towards the dam, which may lead to loss of life of thousands, being taken by Mr. Mohanakrishnan, and thus by the Tamil Nadu Govt. (or may-be it is the other way around). Clearly, it is politically motivated. Democracy (read vote bank politics) is being utilized by a few for their personal gains.
Is it a technical opinion or a historical opinion? Or maybe plain political opinion. The whole article just provides historical facts that no one questions anyways) before making a bold unsubstantiated technical statement "No gravity masonry dam will ever burst and no gravity dam has so far burst in any part of the world" followed by a period! End of story. I don't know what is the status of the dam is but such articles are as unhelpful in knowing that. Moreover such articles can only create a feeling that maybe the dam is actually weak and there are no technical facts to prove its strength.
Dear Mr. Mohanakrishnan, I would like to bring your notice to a statement attributed to you in 'The Hindu' published on May 7, 2011 below: "Engineers should adopt the latest technological formulae while designing infrastructure such as dams, check dams, weirs and shutters for irrigation management". I would like to know whether the author knows what latest technological formulae was adopted in the building of this dam in question. The information provided in the article is what everyone knows, the history of the dam including the agreement between the state governments but what the author has conveniently forgotten to explain and validate are the facts behind the title of the article, the strength and safety of the dam. Without any supporting facts this statement is what it is - a mere statement. It is easy to give out statements like a Politician, but what sensible readers like us are after are some facts and figures - we have enough Politicians in our country !
I HAVE A SOLUTION THAT WILL WORK FOR BOTH. Build a new dam , 300 m downstream, just as kerala says (although its beyond my comprehension as to how another dam, just 300m away can be earthquake proof - but kerala govt has some magic wand probably). Now a new dam makes kerala happy and to make TN happy, operate the existing dam. Incase the exisiting dam doesnt burst, nothing is lost. if it does, the new dam downstream will handle the water.
Thanks for the commentary on how the Dam was built. And of course the statement that the dam is safe. But please validate your findings dear sir. Shared concerns, common interest and scientific vigilance is all that is demanded. Fear-Psychosis is already there. How to remove them is the question.
It's Not Matter of Tamilians or Malayalies ,its matter of people of India , when a dispute is not settled by concern peoples we seek the court and we accept its deccsions @ what happend to Babri Masjid Issue . why in this case the kerla goverment is not ready to accept the court order which has analysed the strenght through scientific methods and confirmed that its strong . Is it that polical game by the Kerla congress Government ?
Would Mohankrishnan recommend all new dams should be constructed with the Mullaperyar technology as they will never burst?
Based on the history how can a person judge the strength of the dam? it has to be analysed through scientific methods. This article is just to support Tamilnadu and not saying anything true..
The author failed to prove his claim in the title. He is talking about the history and not technical proofs to support its' strength. He is talking about the tests done on the materials 116 year back. Can you provide details of the recent tests? The irony is that people are agitating against Kerala after drinking, irrigating and producing electricity from its water for 116 years for only 30 Rupees per acre of reservoir land per year, where as Kerala still says it will provide same amount of water for TN and it needs safety for its people. Just wondering.. If this dam was in the TN and Kerala were the beneficiaries, what could have been all your article about?
It is a pity that many Indian Experts do not qualify to be called as experts as per section 45 of Evidence Act.Even the few Experts are forced to tender wrong advice to the chief Ministers under threats from the reckless Bureaucrats and corrupt politicians who gain at the cost of the public.Educated people remain silent spectators at the growing level of inefficiency among the officials. That is why a good Technical Advisor to Tamilnadu Government on irrigation is forced to utter falsehood that No Masonry Dams failed any where in the world while truth is that 21 Masonry Dams failed including 3 in India.see web site:
www.hydrocoop.org/publications/What_sort_of_risk_analysis.pdf Under Art.51 A[g] of the constitution,no Indian is taking responsibility to protect the Environmental assets as envisaged by Mrs.Indira Gandhi or Mahatma Gandhi who emphasised that the common people of India must be eternally vigilant to correct the mistakes committed even by a prime Minister like Pundit Nehru.
I used to think The Hindu newspaper was the best in India, unbiased and reported the facts without much sensationalism. When you publish articles like these you are degrading credibility of this great newspaper.
Dear Indians, I feel great pain in my heart when we discuss any water issue in our country.First and foremost, we must understand the importance of this issue. This is not something like robbing the peter and paying to the paul.Both of us belong to one mother land india. We should find amicable solution for both sides.Tamil Nadu needs water and kerala needs power for their state.Decide which is good, whether strenthening the existing DAM or demolishing the dam and constructing a new dam? identify the effective ways and means of utilising the natural resources for the benefits of all. Put a big period for this kind of issue for ever.Don't use verbal war agianst each other. We have to accept the law of the land ,If we are responsible citizens of this country.
When Kerala govt is not abiding the supreme court verdict no one is raising any questions. kerala do not accept the Supreme court's expert panel's report. what does it show?. Is it not a mere fear mongering with vested interests?. Lot of people do not know that the discharge on west of the dam is flowing to Iddukki dam and does not affect any village/city.where does this 4 million getting affected comes from?. Please do not get carried away with out knowing the facts.
Both state governments take necessary stpes to sort out the probelem. Both states are depends on each other for thier life. safety of the dam is important. It is true. But at the same time TN faces many promises for water by neighour states are not followed. Is kerala ready to give the power to operate and maintenance the new dam to TN?
To those who think that 116 year old masonry dams are damn safe, here is a fact: In 1927 in Germany, the Ruhr Reservoirs Association took over the Henne Dam and Reservoir built on the Henne River. Its masonry dam was 38 metres high and impounded eleven million cubic metres of water. However, it was decommissioned for safety reasons in 1949 and was replaced by a new Henne Dam and Reservoir with a storage capacity of 38.4 million cubic metres in 1950-1955. Unless and until an exhaustive analysis is performed, nobody can be sure that Mullapperiyar dam is safe. It is the duty of the authorities to submit such an analytical report to the citizens of the country ASAP.
Dear Hindu News Paper and Indian Brothers , I appreciate Hindu for publishing Mr Mohanakrishnans article when the whole Kerala media is making false propoganda,due to Bad political trends in Kerala.People who oppose of publishing this article , If Mr Mohanakrishnan is from kerala orgin what wil be your reaction ? Please as commented before Let us Respect the court order and implement the court order and stop making statement against court order .
i felicitate THE HINDU for raising the awareness among people fallen prey to political ploy.this article stands testimony in verifying the safe,credible and indispensable nature of this dam.people who live around and are learnt to be affected in case of any hazard by this,should educate themselves of its pros and cons and shouldn't trap in fear merely on saying of those who deliberately wants to politicise the issue and gain advantaage.
Dear Folks, First of all, Everybody tell me onething, Do you all accept the agreenment of land lease for dam and still it (agreement) is active? and Kerala's only concern is 'so called' safety of the people in downstream?. If the answers for the above two questions, is YES. I will ask you guys, Why the kerala is vigorously showing interest to build the new dam and taking control of it, instead asking TN (the present and 'so called' damaged dam owner) to build the new one? In all of their agitations, they never raised and asked the TN to build new dam? But how can they ask TN to demolish their property by saying that it is weak. If the real interest of kerala, is building a new dam and taking control of it and use their own land and their own water (even its not their own now, since its in lease agreement for 999 yrs), why they do not speak out directly? But instead of doing that, why they creating false propaganda stating that it will perish the entire downstream districts?
MULLAPERIYAR DAM IS AN ENGINEERING MARVEL. IS Code Recommendation says that before a gravity dam overturns bodily, other types of failures may occur, such as cracking of the upstream material due to tension,increase in uplift,crushing of toe material and sliding. A gravity dam is, therefore, considered safe against overturning. Thus Mullaperiyar dam will never burst the way the present Kerala people are tutored to believe. Any amount of facts, figures , history and geography will not go in to the brainwashed people. Even if LORD AYYAPPA says in a DEVAPRASANNAM about the safety of the Mullaperiyar dam, these people will accuse him of siding with Tamilians. KALLANAI IN TAMIL NADU BUILT WITH SIMILAR TECHNOLOGY IS STANDING GOOD EVEN AFTER 2000 YEARS. The proposal for a new dam downstream, which has caught the fancy of many well-meaning people with no real knowledge of ground realities, is only a ploy to deprive Tamil Nadu of water.
This is an article written with partisan intent. That he absolutizes certain things based on convention is an indication that it is not scientific. The need of the hour is to be reasonable, not emotional. Is Hindu falling into the trap of trying to be popular in one state?
Kerala government's and politicians' concerns over the life risk of their people should be taken into great consideration by TN Government and TN politicians. Kerala Govt.has promised that supply of water to TN will continue even after the construction of new Dam. Politician from both states should address the concerns of their people with sincerity and should try for an amicable solution. But how the new Dam will be a best solution considering that it also will be under doubt on safety after another 100 or 200 years? The new dam also will be in seismic area and will be a threat to life like a water bomb. So the proposal for a new dam should consider as last choice. This article not contributing any thing positive to the solution of this issue unless this debate.
old is solid if not gold. Let's not forget the oldest dam in the world(Grand anicut,kallanai)is in india and is still going strong.
Dear Hindu news paper, I know that there is no point in asking the author of this article about the scientific proofs or evidences for the 'so called' facts listed here. At least you people should have some sort of sense before publishing these types of articles. You have been constantly publishing articles which favours TN.It is a not a good practise to publish one-sided article continuosly for 2-3 days, which may lead to misconception among public who are not much aware of the issue.Please do take care of this.At least give enough space to both the parties. I am asking this only because of the fact that The Hindu is a national newspaper and you people have equal responsibilities to both Kerala and Tamilnadu people.
Article is biased no doubt. But then you can't expect a fair view from an author who represents and advises TN govt on inter-state water issues. What ever people on both sides say the agreement is for 999 years and this dam would certainly not last that period. We will need a new dam in the years to come, no doubt. I hope both govts will come to an understanding on this matter and settle this issue peacefully.
All right thinking citizen will appreciate the matured reaction of Kerala CM on Mulleperiyar issue. His slogan is Water for Tamilnadu, Safety for Kerala. None of the political parties in Kerala never opposed providing water to Tamil Nadu. All political parties in Kerala respect the sentiments of the Tamil Nadu people that water from Mulleperiyar is very much essential for meeting the water requirements of especially five districts of Tamil Nadu. The apprehensions of Keralites who are living near to the dam sites needs to be addressed. I admit, the Kerala Media is responsible for making this issue out of proportion and created a rift between the two states. I appeal to the people of both states not to give this issue an emotional touch.
I am amused to see some of the comments made by the readers. Most of them are saying how can a 116 yr old dam can withstand and scientifically it has to be posted. I wish to bring to their notice that after having made all those scientifical tests through an expert panel only, the Supreme Court ordered in 2006 to increase the storage capacity from 136 ft to 142 ft. Are these emotional common men who are raising the safety issue are technically better than the expert panel ? Again, now an expert panel under ex-CJI Mr. A. S. Anand is inspecting the safety parameters of the dam and the solution is to wait for that committee's report which will be out by Feb'12. Whatever the outcome, people should be ready to accept. Triggering safety concerns prior to that report is not going to help anyone.
Many thanks Hindu for publishing this article and Aruns comments
Dear Sir, Let court decide about the safety of the dam and people. Do not involve any politician, they will play around for votes. People life security securing job is now with court i.e government of india.
Who told that no dams ever collapsed in the world ? at least just check it in google and then you will get a long list collapsed dams and the number of lives it had taken.
While Mr Mohanakrishnan's historical recollections may be accurate I am afraid his grasp over facts and Dam Engineering is poor. He asserts that "No gravity masonry dam will ever burst and no gravity dam has so far burst in any part of the world". What makes them so invulnerable to forces of nature, he leaves unsaid. As for no dams having failed anywhere in the world, facts are otherwise. Clearly Mr Mohanakrishnan's commitment to a political viewpoint is greater than his engineering credentials. It is such viewpoints that prevent a technical solution to Mullaperiyar issue.
Who says it is biased. Engineering has no boundaries. Congratulations.
This controversy is a study in ironic contrasts. A great dam built in the hoary past by men of gigantic abilities and vision, has today become a political football! There is no question that the river waters of India need to be equitably shared among its people. These rivers need to be made a national resource under the guidance of a non-partisan body overseen by the Supreme Court. The people need to see that justice is being done. Justice can never be done by a rabble of self serving politicians. What India needs is men of character and ability who will put the nation's interests first. The finest of India's citizens need to rise and take charge of their country.
Good article.
I have only one question to the author. If he so vehemently vouches for the safety of the 116 year old dam ,then he should do so for the koondamkoolam reactor which is said to of the latest technology possible and try to drive some sense into the TN people and the govt who have been protesting against the formal opening of the reactor.
The article states the history of the dam. The present status with respect to safety needs to be identified; addressed. Probably the two states can sign an agreement to put up a new dam at Kerala's cost & to be handed over to Tamilnadu to meet its water needs. This will put a lid on the whole political twist of the issue; solve the safety issue.
Just google "St Francis Dam" or "Sayano Shusenskaya Dam" to see how hollow is the
author's claim that no gravity dam has ever burst and one never will. Or simply read Taleb's
book "Black Swan". Indian officials in the nuclear and Dam engineering sectors are
inordinately confident of their constructions. One Fukushima or St Francis Dam type incident
in India is almost certain in this century and it will destroy the overconfidence of these
engineers.
There are some aspects which need to be said which no responsible politician or official would dare to say. 1.The Supreme Court Judgement is of course highly respected but some comments make it seem like a final judgement or a divine command.The Supreme Court made the decision based on the report by an empowered committee report which was constituted at a time when AIADMK had significant influence in central govt.Kerala had at that time opposed inclusion of some members in the empowered committee. 2The dispute between two states is political in nature.Neither TN govt nor Kerala govt will settle this issue by a court judgement. 3.Instead of making reasonable arguments the author of this piece has spoken in the tone of politicians in both the sides.If this is the quality of our generalist administrators who advices govt it is high time we brought specialists to head technical bodies like PWD.It will bring some rationality to the discussion as well as all decision making processes.
Inter state water disputes cannot be solved by a weak center. They are worried about running the Govt., for its full term,and are prepared to sacrifice even the interest of the country at times.Can anyone believe that this Govt,is going to solve this one such issue.Never!Never.When the supreme judiciary gives a verdict, if it has some leverage to influence the voters of that particular state then the concerned state will never hesitate to pass a resolution to nullify the courts verdict.The supreme court is still verifying various parameters to find out the safety of the Dam to give its final verdict.The constitutionally elected chief minister says (with his authority)that the dam will be demolished.Alas Unless something through the will of GOD happens there wont be INDIAN UNION.
This uproar on the dam safety is purely the making of the Keralites and vested interest of some property owners of Kerala. They are likely to stoop to any level to achieve their requirement. I cannot understand AS TO HOW THE SC RULING CAN BE OVERLOOKED FOR SO MANY YEARS. The central govt' is a mere spectattor in this case. TN govt' should take it up as a Contempt of Court case and file a suit ASAP to bring the Kerala govt' on its knees. The federal structure of the country is lost if every state behaves like this. TN is always at the receiving end in every dispute. Cauvery water tribunal recommendations are not gazetted by the Central Govt' so far and it is toying with this aspect also. Kerala is ably supported by the Civil servants at the centre as well. As long as this central govt' continues in POWER, only GOD can help to bring the erring parties to their senses.
A just solution could be 1) To construct a new dam (with same FRL capacity of the old dam and to be operated by Tamilnadu)very near to the existing dam(and not downstream,because of fresh ecological issues and difficulty in drawing water to Tamilnadu). 2) The lease agreement be followed for the rest of the period and same quantum of water be drawn to Tamilnadu. 3) The rent and other benefits to Kerala be revised periodically, to the satisfaction of Kerala. By the above arrangement,safety concerns of Kerala and water requirements of Tamilnadu will be met. JAI HIND
The article provides a great summary of historical facts for the common man to appreciate the context better. But lacks substantially on technical data to address the issue of stability of masonry dams. Making a bold technical statement "No gravity masonry dam will ever burst and no gravity dam has so far burst in any part of the world" by a technically competent person is pathetic. I am not familiar with the current structural status of the dam and this article does not help me much in understanding it better, nor does it address the core issue of stability.
The rights of tamils on dam water and the safety of the dam should be ensured. This can't be settled by debate on streets. But by technical experts.
lets hope it will last forever as new.But, can any body say a dam with a guarantee of 50 years which is already 116 years old will not not collapse ?
The author has mentioned more about the history of the dam construction. while he says the lackcity of technologies and equipments during construction of dam no mention about any standard for building the dam. when the expert committee inspected the dam and certified it as good as a new one, did they use any standard for assessing the quality and strength and quantify the different factors? and if yes, which standard was followed and it will be more appropriate to mention them quantum wise than simply specifying the general quality. any expert has to test and compare the quality to an approved standard. the reader gets a general idea about the dam but not about its present strength and safety
Can SC or any experts guarantee that there will not be any damage to a 100 year old dam for another 899 years? If so, they have a hidden agenda.
"No gravity masonry dam will ever burst and no gravity dam has so far burst in any part of the world." he is contradicting himself as he says in the beginning that mullaperiyar is one of the first in the world!!! tell me a dam in operation which is older than mullaperiyar to compare!
People can carry on with their arguments until the DAM comes to an end. As per the title the old Surki dam is too strong. An equal statement would be the primitive computer ENIAC (65 years old) is as good as a Blue Gene super computer. What to say, let the writer build a house just downstream of the mullai periyar dam live there. It is easy to provoke or mislead people, but let the technical matters be tested by authority competent not a politician.
People of the country are smarter now. The Hindu would do well to provide (links) the reports of the tests carried out. They are fed up of politics. So please just give the scientific data.
If the new dam is newly built, there is a way for Kerala to make an agreement afresh, leaving alone the previous "999 agreement" and to enjoy the ownership of this. That is why, the Kerala govt. is spreading over the panic among its people that the dam is in danger. There is a doubt whether the Kerala govt. will agree with the opinion of the panel committee constituted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in this regard. Because, it is well known fact that the Kerala govt. is disobeying the Hon'ble SC's verdict always.
Some of the gravity dam failures in India. 1.Kaddam Project Dam, Andhra Pradesh, failed in August 1958. 2.Kaila Dam, Gujarat, collapsed in 1959. 3.Kodaganar Dam, Tamil Nadu, constructed in 1977 the entire dam was overtopped and breached. 4.Khadakwasla Dam (Mutha, Maharashtra,failed in 1961 5.Tigra Dam: Sank, Madhya Pradesh during construction 1917 The khadakwala dam is particularly interesting. The Dam, near Pune in Maharashtra, was constructed in 1879 as a masonry gravity dam, founded on hard rock. The failure of the dam occurred because of the breach that developed in Panshet Dam, upstream which released a tremendous volume of water into the downstream reservoir at a time when the Khadkawasla reservoir was aleady full. This caused overtopping of the dam because inflow was much above the design flood.Failure occurred within four hours of the visiting flood waters. A replica involving Idukki dam is what people of Kerala are afraid of.
I humbly request the engineers and professors from IITs or any other top institutions of indian to come and inspect the dam ( without bias) and give honest views (this can also be taken as a real project for your students).I also request people to first stop blindly following what ever politians say.They simply add fury to the situation. We are indians first. Think scientifically and stop the blame game.The same goes with kudumkulum.It is not technology that matters,but it is the "confidence on technology" that is it correct and good for mankind that matters.please, lets put our nation first then our states and language.
Wow, such a lot of noise! The dam is said to be in a seismic zone, and one presumes that all relevant facts have been addressed in assessing risks. While Lime / Surki construction can never be as strong as steel rebar reinforced cast concrete construction, the fact remains that such Lime/Surki construction has stood the test of time across the country and beyond - with and without routine maintenance. What happens is that these constructions of dams and bridges in many cases like that of the Grand Anicut, are regularly inspected for potential dangers. Finally, the author is an Avisor to TN govt; a bureaucrat with credentials, and he is not a politician. This should be noted and not glossed over. If several people here insinuate that he is biased then one presumes that a similar charge could be made of the Kerala advisor also. Let the centre decide based on known and proven facts and merits. Yes, one more Commission. Until then it is best that both sides cool it down, and step back.
Mullaperiyar dam is more than 111 years old whereas the life span of a well built dam is around 60 years old. In China very new dam constructed in 1950 had been bursted in 1975 causing more casualties than any other dam failure in history,The Banqiao Reservoir Dam and Shimantan Reservoir Dam are among 62 dams in Zhumadian Prefecture of China's Henan Province that failed catastrophically in 1975 The resulting floods killed at least 171,000 people, making this the worst energy-related disaster in history in terms of loss of life. The Banqiao dam was built in the early 1950s on the Ru River as part of a project to control flooding and generate electricity and as a response to severe flooding in the Huai River Basin in 1949 and 1950. The dam was 118 meters high (387 ft) and had a storage capacity of 492 million m3 (398,000 acre feet), with 375 million m3 (304,000 acre feet) reserved for flood storage. We want some expert Engineers from Western Countries to check the condition of the dam.
Very comprehensive details provided with durable information by Mr. Mohanakrishanan. Kerala politicians are lobbying for resort owners. They already messed up moonar, now if a new dam is built only for the sake of resort owners. For gods sake leave the decision to the court. Let some of those comment on the the old construction and raised issue on the durablity of the dam mullayperiyar, see the kallani built before british in trichy, still going strong
We all love John Pennycuick... great man... real feat of engineering.... i mean seriously... to build this at that age is real courages...kudos... As for the Kallani dam, we Indians should be prouder still..apparently the oldest standing dam in the world...the engg. tech which was used 1600 years ago still holds... But does these two engg marvels bear any connect with the present issue??? Dams have failed in some or the other part of the world EVERY YEAR.... please b reasonable...and give reasonable arguments..
A 116 years old dam situated in earth-quake area of Kerala is 'very safe' for Tamil Nadu but unfortunately not safe for Kerala. What is the problem if a new Dam is constructed there ? I dont understand that.
Sri. Mohanakrishnan on behalf of the TN Govt. can write like this. But you should understand that precaution is better than cure. Consider the situation if it burst due to earth quake.We people in kerala may immediately washed away.Then what will be the future of the districts in TN which receives water now?. A new dam is inevitable to TN and Kerala.
This is a good opportunity for the ruling Congress Government to show that they really care for the people of India (especially South) by coming to the discussion table with Kerala and Tamilnadu Government representatives. They have to simply go ahead with the Supreme Court's order and come to a amicable settlement bearing mind that India's Unity in Diversity. Open talk will some times may click in the forth coming by election in favor of the Congress.
Height of Kallanai is 18ft, can it be even classified as a Dam? It a meager bund, not a Dam. Mullaperiyar is 176ft. How can an 18 feet structure be compared with a 176 feet structure ?
Experts keep saying now and again that a NEW DAM IS NOT HYDROLOGICALLY FEASIBLE. Kerala has already started blaming that the expert committee acts against their interest. Let's wait for the report of the committee constituting C D Thatte and D K Mehta. I would wonder, if my fellow citizens from Kerala would accept the report if it was against their 'interests'.
For any scientific creature,Renovation and modernization increases its lifetime. As these renovation and modernization has been carried out as per Supreme court direction and court ordered to increase water level 142 ft. .....Suppose for a new dam,What is the guarantee will Kerala offer to Tamilnadu to continue the supply as even Kerala govt passed the amendment and challenged the supreme court judgement?? This is deliberate move to takeover the control of dam!!!
By seeing all the opinions coming in the recent media reports, it is clear that the issue is not between the people of two states. Politicians need to be more restraint and should not use this issue to kill the very purpose of MP Dam. Drought prone districts of TN could benefit for more than 100 years so far. Why not continue to get such benefits. Let us find the practical solution of getting another dam and water the TN districts as before... Why allow the politicians to make this a favourable subject for their votes...
With reference to the report of Mr.Mohanakrishanan, Mullaperiyar dam can be recommended for 8th World Wonder next time,
"As one closely associated with this dam and the strengthening measures undertaken I am pained to see the controversies being raised on its safety" - this sums up the mindset of the author in a nutshell. He has been highly emotionally connected to the dam and the "strengthening measures" (if at all such measures have been happening). After all, it would take quite some effort to demean the subject/product of one's own work. As has been rightly pointed out by many readers, the fear in the heart of the people is not just psychosis. Even if one takes for granted the author's statement that "no gravity dam has so far burst in any part of the world" he does not have any right to say that no gravity dam will ever burst. After all, "Black Swan" events eventually do happen, howsoever less probability they may have. And when they do happen (which finally would serve as an eye-opener for all the optimists out there), the scale of devastation will be huge.
First of all, I would like to iterate that this article lacks the technical facts to back the title. I understand Mr.Mohanakrishnan's obligation to support the TN in this dam row because of the role he is assigned with. But what I do not understand is, why Hindu is publishing such biased opinions without the backing of proper data. It is very much clear that the author has written this opinion just for the sake of publishing rather than to make people understand TN's stand in the dam row. As a reader, I would certainly like to know the TN view points but not in the manner this article describes. I expect Hindu to be more cautious while publishing articles related to such sensitive issues and also I request Hindu to publish articles with proper scientific backing which hopefully, can result in an amicable solution of Mullaperiyar issue.
The so called experts of Central Water Commission certified that the IG dam of Rajastan safe in 2005 but it burst in 2008 causing heavy damage .Millions were saved just because the onrush of water got diverted to scantily populated areas.So lets take the experts' opiion with a pinch of salt.The issue in Mullapperiar is that the benefactor has to suffer all the risks and beneficiery can bully or buy the Centre and the SC at will.The feudal landlords of the Vaigai basin will go to any lengths to maintain control of the dam since the river is a money making machine without any risks.The option avalible before the Kerala govt is to decommission and demolish the killer dam .
Concerns from both states are genuine and needs to be addressed in a win-win fashion. Think and act as Indians. Please do not mix colours when it comes to a topic that you have no idea, just add plai imagination and publish! The fear is not propagated by politicians or the so-called "resort-owners", but i know in person, even before the topic is not as hot s this, few of my close relatives stay near to the dam area have reported numerous small and medium earth-quakes and also have shared the fear and feelings of te localites many times. The miscreants are never in favour of any genuine issue, but taking this opportunity to create panic. Pathetic is : be it politicians or advisors/experts - they ake coloured and biased opinions even before examining the whole aperture. acting on prejudice.
If the dam breaks, millions of Keralites will die because of flooding and at the same time millions in 6 districts Tamil Nadu will starve for want of Water. With a new dam, both these problems can be solved. Yet Tamilnadu is blindly refusing the demand of Kerala. We can understand that Tamil Nadu Government & Political Parties do not care the safety of Keralites. But have you ever thought that how will you compensate for the Water scarcity of your own people, if the dam beaks?
The people and politicians of Tamilnadu will never accept the Mullaiperiyar dam is weak unless told by supreme court.Still worse,the people and politicians of kerala will never accept the dam is strong,even if told by the Supreme court of India,leave alone the experts.That is the only difference between the two sides.
As Ramaswami Iyer pointed out even the supreme court cannot take a decision on ensurisng the safety of the dam for many more years to come based upon the reports of expert committees who can give different kinds of reports both for and against the Mullaperiyar dam depending upon their own understanding about the problem just as the blind men describe the elephant. Both the states are right in getting bothered about how to hammer out a solution in the interests of the both the states. To me the existing dam is 2890ft MSL, with FRL +155ft height and hence the existing dam is having an FRL of +3044ft above mean sea level while the tunnel is having +104ft. that is 2994ft MSL . The proposed new dam about 300m below the existing dam will have a height of 136ft above the ground with 2230 MSL and hence FRl of new dam will be +2366ft MSL Hence there is a difference of 630ft between the tunnel bottom and FRL of new dam 300m below the existing dam. Hence new dam cannot provide water to Tamilnadu.
Dam may be safe for the time being.Due to natural calamites it may get damaged and cause loss to life and properties of the locals. The same fear is sighted as a reason for Koodamkulam Nucleor Project by the people in the area. Then why double standard for accepting a suggetion to construction of a new Dam without affecting supply of water to Tamilnadu people.
I thank the author for sharing his expert opinion with The Hindu
readers. It would help us to understand more about this issue if a
similar expert opinion from a Kerala engineer is published.
i believe that the hint of the committee talking about the control of
the new dam is acceptable and it shows the central govt is also
accepting the fact that their is a requirement of new dam
i would always say that it should follow the same as the Siruvani dam
that provide water for Kovai.. Kerala is never against providing water to Tamil Nadu but politicians in Tamil Nadu wanted to capitalize on this by making a huge issue and they will now turn upvto the people as this their achievement. but in fact from day one Kerala was saying safe living place for Keralites and water for Tamil Nadu. But in fact by building an new dam Tamil Nadu will get more water than it used to get till date.
It is good that Subhashini has opened the topic in a technical angle to suggest different solutions.One solution is to raise the height of the New Dam with FRL at3025 ft.,MSL that corresponds to the Existing 136 ft.level at which the tunnel is fed.It means that the New Dam should be not with 136 ft,.height but must be raised by more than 100ft., to enable kerala to provide water to Tamil Nadu.The present Dam should continue until the New Dam is completed to avoid denial of swter to Tamil farmers. i have used rough levels from Google Earth Search and hence kerala Experts must come out with genuine proposal to justify the slogan of their Chief Minister"Safety for Kerala and Water for Tamilnadu".
If Union Government is involved like in Tehri Dam corporation,why not a similaer arrange ment be made here so that all the clearencde can be taken in time and funds can flow from World Bank and NRI people.Let not Experts of both states play with lives of millions of people of both the states
It is easy for the Unaffected people to formulate theories and opinions. Simple wisdom is if something thretens your life, simply get rid of it and seek alternatives.Can any right thinking MIND ever consider a dam BUILT TO BE SAFE FOR 50 YEARS BY THE DESIGNER AS SAFE AS A NEW dam...??? Forget about the 999 years long lease agreement in this modern world of democracy, human rights, fundumental rights etc...and the auther struggles to justify all these??? and claims to be unbiased!!!I think the solution lies in constructing a new dam and making a sensible and realistic agreement ....acceptable to both... That is what an agreement really means.
We may never have a "solution acceptable to both sides". Sides have taken stands on this issue not necessarily reflecting their interests, looking for a better deal for their sides, but are showboating for political gains. What we could have is a solution that addresses the real concerns of each side; not the publicly stated concerns which are full of fanciful claims and opinions unsupported by facts (sample: garvity dams cannot fail....) but the REAL concers. In other words safety for Kerala and water and power for TN. Framed in this manner, the issue admits technical solutions. The solution can be guaranteed by the Centre. All of this is within the realm of possibility. But are the two sides really looking for solutions or are they looking for issues with which to whip up public passions in order to distract from governance failures? Why is the centre sitting on the sidelines and not knocking heads together?
Is the dam about to break in very near future and is it already turned to be useless -- as claimed and made out in the KL govt. case? No it is not. The CWC studies, many neutral experts studies have said that the dam is healthy (IIT rourkee study was only on the seismic aspect based on 1% likelyhood risk of dam getting damaaged if a quake of magnitude 6 or above occurs. The area is in sesimic zone where per scientific classification tremors at the max of 5 magnitude can occur). So the fear is not needed. The dam will not break now. So are we pinning that this dam whose projected life passed is going to stay for another 650+ years (till the master agreement remains)? Obviously we should not. The solution?
First the fear should subside, pending maintenance activities be carried out for immediate effect. Within a year from there a new dam has to be built at the very site, fully honouring the agreement (i.e. as if this dam stays) in a decade or score years from then.
"Rs 12 per KW year !!...this must be the cheapest of the cheapest electric power tariff paid in the entire world. What a ridiculous low rate. It is extremely unfair to Kerala in all respects and should be reviewed by order of the Supreme Court."@Suresh...then any reason why KL has not pushed for renewing the suplementary agreement of 1970, in 2000, which said itself to be renewed every 30 years? If TN was adamant of not signing it why hasn't KL gone to SC to get this done?
Why this panic about this dam? Till 2006 there was no panic about the safety of the dam. When the Supreme Court ordered to raise the water level to 142, this panic was orchestrated with two purposes (1) only way to change the SC order is to raise the issue of danger to lives and (2) to create fear psychosis so that a mass movement against the dam can be created. But according to experts the dam is safe. The Seismic Map of India prepared by seismic experts has not shown Mullaperiyar in the seismic zone. Now the question is whether Kerala is prepared to give water to the parched lands in the five districts in Tamil Nadu. Water belongs to the Nation and not to a particular State. According to Nehru dams are the temples of resurgent India. To break a dam is like breaking a temple. If water is denied there will be riots and revolutions by peasants, as we witness today in TN. When we survey the political events today, any attempt to demolish the present dam or to construct a new dam will lead to a mass upsurge by peasnats and political leaders leading to the breakdown of the government machinery. Kerala's objective, "Water for Tamil Nadu and safety for Kerala" can be made a reality by constructing the new dam at the exact site of the present dam and to raise the water level as directed by the Supreme Court.
The St. Francis Dam was a concrete gravity-arch dam, designed to create a reservoir as a storage point of the Los Angeles Aqueduct. It was located in San Francisquito Canyon of the Sierra Pelona Mountains, 40 miles (64 km) northwest of Los Angeles, California, near the present city of Santa Clarita. The dam was built between 1924 and 1926 under the supervision of William Mulholland, chief engineer and general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, then called the Bureau of Water Works and Supply. Three minutes before midnight on March 12, 1928, the dam failed catastrophically, and the resulting flood killed more than 450 people. The collapse of the St. Francis Dam is one of the worst American civil engineering failures of the 20th century
Sir, As far as the issues of both neighbours are concerned, 'new dam required' would be wise decision. The new dam supposed to build in Kerala's territory, so obviously Kerala would be the owner. For operation, a joint committee can be formed by selecting qualified and experienced engineers/experts from Kerala, Tamilnadu and central government appointed neutral specialists. Number of specialists from each state, number of neutral specialists from center and other Terms&conditions can be finalised by discussion of both Kerala and Tamilnadu administration. These things are possible in this modern world, if both parties have a will to do so.
Apart from emotional reactions to the news circulated in media, I have never seen any concrete scientific study on the strength of the structure circulated anywhere in media/net. And the way this issue is shaping up, I don't even think people will believe even if there is one, as the way politicians are trying to manipulate the situation.And I don't have faith in our politicians, and none in our courts too. We do not have any mechanism to make good timely decisions abt anything, that s some times another side effect of being democratic. One day I feel I will wake up to read the worst man made disaster in history from the news papers.
TajMahal is the man made object. Is it lasting even now? There are many temples in India which is there for many centuries. Destructing any thing is easy but construction is very difficult. Only the dams constructed after independence will be weak (as they will be constructued by corrupt officers and politicians) and having a high chance of getting breaked. But not a dam mullai periyar dam which is constructed with nature force. Gravitational force is a big force to which nothing can match
Please Email the Editor