Opinion » Readers' Editor

Updated: June 29, 2010 11:28 IST

Growing awareness about environment

S. Viswanathan
Comment (4)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
S. Viswanathan, Readers' Editor.
The Hindu
S. Viswanathan, Readers' Editor.

The last column (“How The Hindu covered the 1984 Bhopal calamity”), published on June 21, 2010, has been well received. Referring to an observation made on the Three Mile Island accident and its aftermath in The Hindu's leader on Bhopal published on December 5, 1984, a reader has made some comments. The relevant paragraph reads: “This led to a re-examination of the design, operations, and safety features in nuclear stations across the world and, as a result, the dangers associated with nuclear power plants have been drastically reduced.”

The reader, Dr. Siva Kandasami (Coimbatore), an independent structural consultant who has worked in the nuclear industry, makes a case for “enhanced clarity in perception”: “Despite the best of efforts and technological advances, the grave threat of accident in a nuclear plant is real and the consequences are undisputedly lethal. As a fall out of the Three Mile Island accident, better safety mechanisms have been designed and in fact only the probability of occurrence has been drastically reduced and the dangers remain. To bring some realism [into the discussion], the recent accident (in July 2007) at the sensitive Sellafield thorium reprocessing facility in the U.K., which shockingly took eight months to comprehend, indicates the increasing complexity in modern plant operations.”

The reader's concern over the continuing threat from nuclear installations is understandable. But the leader writer's focus in December 1984 would have been on a proper inquiry into the functioning or malfunctioning of the safety mechanisms in the Bhopal plant. Hence the comparison with the Three Mile Island accident in which there was no loss of life or injury to anybody. The characterisation of the Bhopal tragedy as “the worst environmental disaster in history” and the reference to the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant and the Sellafield Ltd. (formerly known as Windscale), a thorium reprocessing facility in U.K., take the discussion further — to the growing environmental awareness among people besides the real, continuing risks in operating nuclear reactors despite improvements in their design and safety aspects.

On April 26, 1986, less than two years after Bhopal, a major accident in a nuclear plant at Chernobyl in the Ukraine region of the Soviet Union sent shock waves across the world. It caused the dislocation and resettlement of over 3,36,000 people, although the official count of the dead was only 52. The disaster proved to be a teacher by negative example. It raised public awareness of industrial, and especially nuclear power industry, safety across the world and led to tangible improvements on the ground.

Chipko and Silent Valley

Although conservation, environmentalism, and ecology have all been familiar to India since the early 20th century, mass awareness of the specific issues is only of recent origin. An effective environmental movement began to take root in India only in the 1970s. The Declaration of the Conference of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm in 1972 helped create a lot of interest in environmental studies in India. In fact, two strong movements emerged, one in the Himalayan region in the north, the other in the Western Ghats region of the far South in the mid-1970s. The Chipko Movement of the North predates, by a few years, the “Save Silent Valley movement” in Kerala and Southern India.

The Chipko Movement comprised a group of villagers in the Uttarakhand region of India who were opposed to commercial logging. The first direct action was spontaneous. It was staged in 1973 by the people of Mandal village in the forest area of the Upper Alaknanda Valley against the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to allot a plot of forest land to a sports goods company. The people were naturally angry considering that the authorities had refused them permission to use the wood in the forest to make simple agricultural tools.

Thanks to the encouragement of a non-governmental organisation, Dasoli Gram Swarajya Sangh, a group of women led by an activist entered the forest and encircled the trees, preventing the men from cutting them down. Poor women hugging trees with a view to preventing forest guards from felling the trees has become an iconic image for the environmental movement in India — at its best. Leading the struggle for justice was an array of iconic figures like Sunderlal Bahuguna and the writer Mahaswetha Devi. From resisting the felling of trees to mobilising people against large-scale displacement through the construction of big dams, the movement spread its wings, bringing in tens of thousands of men and women. The leaders' commitment to the Gandhian strategy of non-violent protest has proved to be an important moral advantage.

Role of the media

Another tangible advantage for the champions of the Chipko movement was sustained support from the news media. The communication and people skills of the movement's leaders, many of whom had an academic and scientific background combined with activism, certainly helped. In the 1970s, several universities conducted workshops for journalists on conservation, the environment, and related issues. These developments enabled journalists to reach out to the people with competent, and often expert, inputs from environmentalists. Today, almost all newspapers publish articles on environment-related issues on a fairly regular basis, although there is much scope for qualitative improvement. The Hinduhas been publishing an annual Survey of the Environment for nearly two decades now.

Kerala Minister for Forests Binoy Viswam, for one, has appreciated the contribution of the media in creating popular awareness of the need to protect and improve the environment. In an interview published in the online edition of The Hinduon the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Silent Valley Movement in December 2009, Mr. Viswam rightly called attention to the fact that one of the most important positive changes in social attitudes during the half century following the formation of Kerala was the growth in environmental consciousness. He attributed this growth to the message of the Stockholm Convention of 1972 and to the ‘Save the Silent Valley' movement in his State. The movement was a turning point in that it demanded and brought the attention of society to matters not discussed or attended to previously. ‘Save the Silent Valley' was launched against a hydroelectric project cleared by the Planning Commission in 1973 and taken up for implementation three years later by the State Government. Had the project been implemented, it would have submerged a beautiful rainforest on the Western Ghats, adversely affecting the flora and fauna in the Valley, besides ruining its ecosystem. Thanks to a seven-year-long non-violent struggle, a progressive response from Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, and the Centre's eventual denial of permission to the project (based on the recommendation of an expert committee headed by an eminent scientist, M.G.K. Menon), the project was abandoned in 1984.

There is little doubt that there has been a significant rise in the number of Indians aware of, and concerned over, environmental issues. This number will increase further and attain critical mass when more working people start realising that pressures on, and threats to, their lives and livelihoods are very real when imbalances are created in the system. Apprehension of the adverse impact of global warming and climate change on agriculture and water availability has brought in a new dimension. This is where the Indian news media, which have not done a bad job so far of covering climate change issues, need to raise both the qualitative and quantitative levels of their efforts — with help from scientists and other experts.

I am a wellsite geologist. I am working now at Barmer in the heart of Thar desert for petroleum production. Though we are growing in the sence of energy sequrity and per capita availability of energy sources, we are at the same time marching towards the rampage and devastation of nature. Since I was here, I have noticed a sharp downfall in the appearance of Peacock here. There is also a sharp decline in the ground water availability. Always there is a political hype that we are concerned about our environment, if someone will have a visit to any village he might be able to feel the worst fury of nature.

Posted on: Aug 15, 2010 at 10:46 IST

Correction: There was at least one death to an engineer in Three Mile Island. But it could have been 1,000s - The Union Carbide story is one of the most tragic. I think about it often, as I was only 4 years old in the US when it happend. I Remember hearing about it, and reading about it when I was older, still touches me. Will the people ever get justice?

from:  myName
Posted on: Aug 13, 2010 at 23:48 IST

As we know india rather than whole world face the problem of energy crisis, its good to shift over to other source of energy to met our future requirement rather to wholly depend on fossil fuel.Other source like atomic energy, solar energy,wind energy etc by exploiting these we might able to combat with manance of energy crisis.But,laying stress solemnly on develping deadly & notorious nuclear power plant is not an intelligency which is associated with deadly accident starting from producing upto its disposal .If it is associated with so many human health hazards,major causes of conflict among nation then why not we switch over to other alternative source like solar energy which is ultimate source of energy,even today we are not able harness one percent of solar energy.we must try to development such advance technology to harness solar energy rather to just knocking the door of nuclear energy associated with problem which might led to nuclear warfare ultimately leading to endangering of human life on this beatuiful planet.

from:  surindersingh
Posted on: Jul 1, 2010 at 18:03 IST

Environmental degradation in the districts of Nilagiri, Coimbatore, Tirupur,Erode, Karur, salem, Namakkal and Dindigul is mind boggling. Rivers Noyyal and Amaravathy are finished. Bhavani and Cauvery are facing a similar fate. Crop yield dwindles. Cancer is on the rise. Infertility among people and cattle are rampant. Many Bhopals are very quitely created in Kongunadu in the name of development. While we talk about other eco-movements elsewhere in India, the media in general and the Hindu in particular have an onerous responsibility to protect our rivers and people in Kongunadu.

from:  Sankara Narayanan
Posted on: Jun 30, 2010 at 09:06 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Columnists Listing



Recent Article in Readers' Editor

A.S. Paneerselvam

New skills for new challenges

In this era, when data journalism is seen as a way forward to deal with difficult issues in a balanced, unbiased manner, it is important to understand the rules that govern statistical data collection. »