Corrections and Clarifications -- December 18, 2013

December 17, 2013 07:33 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 06:11 pm IST

>>A sentence in > Italian woman not given exit permit (Dec. 15, 2013) read: “The FRRO asked for some documents that I [the Italian woman] did not have. So, they asked me to come back on November 8. On December 8, they said they cannot process my application …” It should have been November 8 .

>>A sentence in the report, > T-Bill likely to hit roadblock (Dec. 14, 2013, some editions), read: “According to Article 371 (F), applicable to Arunachal Pradesh , …” Actually, it is Article 371(H) which is applicable to Arunachal Pradesh and not Art 371 (F). Provisions of Article 371 (H) are sought to be invoked to vest the Governor with special powers to supervise matters relating to law and order and revenue in Hyderabad, the proposed common capital.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.