Corrections and clarifications — December 13, 2013

December 12, 2013 07:10 pm | Updated November 26, 2021 10:25 pm IST

>> In the Op-Ed page interview, > If unwittingly we err, history will not forgive us (Dec. 12, 2013), the second question — By opting to sit in opposition in Delhi, are you shying away from the task of delivering on your ideals? — and the answer to it, got merged in the answer to the first question. It was an editing error.

>> > BJP report pitches for poll tie-up with TDP (Dec. 12, 2013) said the Parkal seat was won by the TRS by a margin of 20,000 votes. Actually, the margin of victory was 2,000 votes.

>>A sentence in > Is keeping animals in captivity slavery? (S&T page, Speaking of Science column) read: “The state of Colorado in the U.S. wanted in 2008 to establish a law … be given the some constitutional rights that a human being enjoys.” It should have been same constitutional rights.

>>In the Business page report, > Eli Lilly enters branded generics; launches four cancer drugs (Dec. 11, 2013), the name of one of the new drugs the company had launched was given as Ininotecan. It should have been Irinotecan .

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.