48692: BJP attacks UPA's foreign policy

The regional policy statements are standard BJP boilerplate, but the party adopted a peculiarly harsh view towards US/India relations. BJP insiders assured us privately that the statements were only political rhetoric meant to score points against the UPA.

March 19, 2011 03:35 am | Updated September 30, 2016 11:08 pm IST

48692 12/28/2005 9:04 05 NEWDELHI 9761 Embassy New Delhi CONFIDENTIAL "VZCZCXRO7638OO RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHLH RUEHPWDE RUEHNE #9761/01 3620904ZNY CCCCC ZZHO 280904Z DEC 05FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHITO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7925INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9416RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 2529RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 2552RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 5382RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 2162RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 3192RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 7524RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 5898RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 2508RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 0529RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 0169RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 1415RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE 1865RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 9441RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR 2557RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0434RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDCRUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DCRHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HIRUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0385RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDCRHHJJPI/PACOM IDHS HONOLULU HIRHMFISS/HQ USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FLRHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FLRUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDCRUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC" "C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 NEW DELHI 009761

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/28/2015 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, IN SUBJECT: THE BJP ATTACKS UPA FOREIGN POLICY

Classified By: A/DCM Geoff Pyatt, for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)

1. (C) Summary: The BJP leadership, meeting in Mumbai on December 26-27, continued its twisting foreign policy trajectory, issuing a public statement on ""The UPA's Mismanagement of our Foreign Policy,"" that was so shrilly critical of Congress initiatives that it drew a public rebuke from former Prime Minister Vajpayee. The BJP asserted that the ruling coalition lacks ""an integrated foreign policy vision,"" and accused Prime Minister Singh of subordinating India's foreign policy to the US. Although billed as an overall foreign policy statement, it dealt only with regional policy (Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh) and the US/India relationship. The regional policy statements are standard BJP boilerplate, but the party adopted a peculiarly harsh view towards US/India relations. BJP insiders assured us privately that the statements were only political rhetoric meant to score points against the UPA. It is not unusual for domestic political considerations to take precedence over foreign policy in India, and the BJP decided there was little risk of negative fallout with the USG. Other reporting on the BJP national convention follows septel. End Summary.

Poor Performance in the Region

------------------------------

2. (U) The BJP accused the GOI of converting the districts of West Bengal bordering Bangladesh into ""extremely sensitive regions with potentially disastrous security implications"" by encouraging illegal immigration, and noted that India has ""no identifiable policy"" to deal with the GOB. The statement claimed that the UPA's Pakistan policy has ""abandoned the issue of cross border terrorism,"" and by ""reiterating endlessly that 'the peace process is irreversible,"" has done nothing to discourage ""jehadi terrorists"" supported by Pakistan. The BJP called on the GOI to return to the Nepal policy of the former NDA government based on ""the twin pillars of a stable democracy and a constitutional monarchy."" The statement accused the UPA of entertaining proposals advocated by ""certain American think tanks"" calling for the establishment of a ""United States of Kashmir,"" and called on the GOI to reaffirm that ""the entire states of Jammu and Kashmir are integral parts of India.""

Pulling out the Anti-US Card

----------------------------

3. (U) Pointing out that the ""Clinton Administration first recognized India as a 'natural ally,"" the BJP statement claimed that the important issues, (increased cooperation in civil-nuclear activities, civilian space programs, high technology trade, and missile defense) were initiated by the previous NDA government, which stressed a ""gradual improvement in Indo-US relations."" Accusing the UPA of engaging in ""obsequious policies"" that have locked India into an ""asymmetrical relationship,"" the BJP emphasized that a ""strategic partnership must be between equals.""

4. (U) In comments to reporters former Foreign Minister Yashwant Sinha elaborated further on the BJP statement, berating the UPA for ""capitulation"" to the US (implicitly referring to the IAEA-Iran vote), and drawing a parallel with the US/Pakistan relationship. Sinha argued that ""the interests of India and the US need not converge all the time,"" and claimed that it was ""unwise for India to get

NEW DELHI 00009761 002 OF 002

locked into the strategic interests of the US, like for example Pakistan is locked in Afghanistan.""

Nothing to Worry About

----------------------

5. (C) In a private conversation on December 28, BJP National Executive Member Seshadiri Chari urged us ""not to read to much into the foreign policy resolution, especially the parts relating to the US."" Chari dismissed the statement as ""standard practice"" aimed at scoring easy political points against the UPA. BJP spokesman Prakash Javdekar echoed these statements, saying that the BJP was not really upset about the US/India relationship, but merely wanted the GOI and USG to be more forthcoming about any deal on nuclear policy.

Comment - Domestic Politics to the Fore

---------------------------------------

6. (C) The BJP out of power is more interested in UPA bashing than in nurturing the US/India relationship. There is lingering sensitivity among portions of the Indian electorate regarding possible ""subservience"" to the US, and a nationalist party like the BJP can energize its core membership by asserting Indian independence. BJP leaders do not seem overly concerned about the repercussions of their anti-US rhetoric, convinced that a few well-placed private assurances will mollify the USG. A notable exception is Former Prime Minister Vajpayee, who publicly criticized the BJP statement, stating that foreign policy ""is complex"" and ""it would have been better if more time had been devoted to discussing the subject."" ""The foreign policy resolution is tough. I can't understand it. The language is also unique,"" he concluded.

7. (U) Visit New Delhi's Classified Website: (http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/sa/newdelhi/)

BLAKE

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.