Back from talks, interlocutors say Collector is safe

April 29, 2012 12:37 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 11:33 pm IST - Hyderabad

A file photo of Sukma Collector Alex Paul Menon who was kidnapped by Maoists.

A file photo of Sukma Collector Alex Paul Menon who was kidnapped by Maoists.

The two interlocutors, who held talks with Maoists in the Bastar forests to free Sukma Collector Alex Paul Menon, returned to Raipur, Chhattisgarh capital, on Sunday afternoon, but the suspense over his fate continued. The negotiators, B.D. Sarma and Prof. Haragopal, held talks with top Maoist leaders at an undisclosed location deep inside the forests in the southern parts of the State. They returned to Chintalnar, from where a government helicopter flew them back to Raipur.

They refused to disclose anything on the Maoist response to the government’s proposals, but affirmed that Mr. Menon was “doing well,” government sources told The Hindu on the phone from Raipur. They drove to the Pahuna guesthouse, where the government-nominated negotiators, Nirmala Buch and S.K. Mishra, were waiting for them.

“The negotiators have come back. Discussions are going on,” was the terse response from the Chief Minister’s office, while top police officers maintained that “things are progressing.”

“We are hopeful [of positive developments],” was how Additional Director-General Ramniwas responded to questions. With the government spokespersons, police officers and interlocutors maintaining total secrecy, it’s turning out to be an exasperating experience for journalists covering the eight-day-old crisis.

Sources said the Maoists had scaled up the number of jailed naxalites they want freed for the release of the Collector. Initially, they had demanded the release of eight and then increased the number to 17. Now, the militants want 75 people released, saying they were implicated in false cases. Their other major demand is a halt to ‘Operation Green Hunt.’

The government has responded that it cannot order the release of the naxalite leaders as they were under judicial custody. All it could do is not oppose the bail petitions in courts.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.