"Incontrovertible evidence of Trinamool-Maoist nexus"

Left, TDP, JD(S) submit memorandum to Home Minister

January 06, 2011 04:05 pm | Updated January 07, 2011 02:31 am IST - New Delhi

CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury talks to the media after meeting Home Minister P Chidambaram at North Block in New Delhi on Thursday. Photo: PTI

CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury talks to the media after meeting Home Minister P Chidambaram at North Block in New Delhi on Thursday. Photo: PTI

Seeking to turn the tables on the United Progressive Alliance government, the Left parties, the Telugu Desam Party and the Janata Dal (Secular) on Thursday said it should decide on continuing alliance with the Trinamool Congress alleging its nexus with Maoists.

Claiming “incontrovertible evidence of collaboration” between the Trinamool and Maoists, leaders of these parties submitted a memorandum to Home Minister P. Chidambaram and asked the Manmohan Singh government to state how it planned to deal with the nexus.

“The responsibility of overcoming the impact of the Maoist violence is not the responsibility of the State governments alone, it is a phenomenon which spans across several States. Therefore, the Union government also has a responsibility,” the memorandum said.

Addressing journalists after the meeting, CPI(M) Polit Bureau member Sitaram Yechury reiterated that while on one hand the Prime Minister described Maoist violence as the gravest threat to India's internal security, how can the government allow the Trinamool leaders hobnob with Maoists?

Referring to the recent communication from the Home Minister to West Bengal Chief Minister, the memorandum said the six parties were constrained to draw his attention to the facts that pointed to the nexus as also media reports during the last three years “revealing the nature of the nexus.”

The parties said while earlier it was felt that the Trinamool-Maoist nexus charge was made just by the Left parties, the memorandum and annexures contained views of what leaders of Trinamool themselves had to say of this understanding.

The document also referred to a book by Trinamool MP Kabir Suman in which he gave an eyewitness account of meetings attended by Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee and her colleague Sougata Roy with two Maoist leaders who were currently imprisoned. Discussions at these meeting revolved around possible intervention in Nandigram.

The parties also took objection to his reference to CPI (M) activists as ‘harmads' stating that it did not keep with the majesty of the Home Minister's office. The parties also said the description was not only derogatory but used by Maoists to describe hapless victims belonging to the CPI (M) activists who were eliminated through “individual assassinations and through their self appointed kangaroo courts declared in the posters left behind with the dead bodies.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.