Sharks lose fight at U.N. meeting

March 23, 2010 05:17 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 07:17 am IST - DOHA

FILE --An Oct. 27, 2005 file photo shows a hammerhead shark in a large tank at the Georgia Aquarium, in Atlanta. A U.S.-backed proposal to protect the heavily fished hammerhead sharks was narrowly rejected Tuesday, March 23, 2010, over concerns by Asia nations that regulating the booming trade in shark fins could hurt poor nations.  (AP Photo/John Bazemore, file)

FILE --An Oct. 27, 2005 file photo shows a hammerhead shark in a large tank at the Georgia Aquarium, in Atlanta. A U.S.-backed proposal to protect the heavily fished hammerhead sharks was narrowly rejected Tuesday, March 23, 2010, over concerns by Asia nations that regulating the booming trade in shark fins could hurt poor nations. (AP Photo/John Bazemore, file)

Asian nations on Tuesday blocked U.S.-backed proposals to protect the heavily fished hammerhead and oceanic whitetip sharks on concerns that regulating the booming trade in fins could hurt poor coastal nations.

Japan, which successfully campaigned against an export ban on Atlantic bluefin tuna and regulations on the coral trade, led the opposition to the shark proposal at the 175-nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.

China, Indonesia and other nations that benefit from the trade in fins joined the opposition to the proposals arguing that trade restrictions were not the answer and would be difficult to apply.

“This is not about trade issues but fisheries enforcement,” Masanori Miyahara, chief counsellor of the Fisheries Agency of Japan, told delegates. “Poaching is a big problem. Small-scale long liners are chasing sharks all over the world.”

But the United States supported by Europe, Australia and many Arab countries argued that the unregulated trade has led to widespread illegal fishing and has caused the populations of the endangered scalloped hammerhead, great hammerhead and the threatened smooth hammerhead to plummet by as much as 85 per cent.

“The greatest threat to the hammerhead is from harvest for the international fin trade and the fin of the species is among highly valued of the trade,” Tom Strickland, U.S. assistant secretary of the interior for fish said. Shark fin soup is a much prized delicacy in China.

Oceanic whitetip sharks face similar threats and their numbers are down 60 to 70 per cent, Mr. Strickland said.

The hammerhead measure was only narrowly rejected by the U.N. committee, failing by five votes to take the necessary two-thirds of majority. The whitetip proposal fell nine votes short of approval.

Mr. Strickland said it was possible they would try and revive the proposal at the larger, plenary meeting which begins on Wednesday.

“It’s disappointing we didn’t get the two-thirds but that is the way the rules are set up,” Mr. Strickland said. “We are going to continue our efforts both here and going forward to put the necessary protection in place for these shark species.”

The tiny Pacific nation of Palau, which last year created the first ever shark sanctuary, joined the Americans in introducing the shark proposals. It called on countries to protect the species so they can be fished well into the future.

“We must preserve for our children these amazing species,” said Palau’s Minister for Natural Resources, Environment and Tourism Harry R. Fritz, adding that his country supports the protection of other shark species as well.

The convention was due to take up European proposals later in the day for protections of the porbeagle shark which is killed for its meat and the spiny dogfish shark — a chief ingredient of fish and chips and fish sticks.

Conservationists were outraged and disappointed by the rulings, since it came after a string of defeats on marine species including a proposal last week on a shark conservation plan. Japan and China led efforts to kill that proposal, as well.

“Today is a huge loss for the oceans. This is a case of politics prevailing over science,” Oceana’s Fisheries Campaign Manager Elizabeth Griffin said. “The world failed to stand up today to protect some of the ocean’s top predators.”

Jupp Baron Kerckerinck zur Borg, president of the Shark Research Institute based in Millbrook, N.Y., acknowledged he was “very disappointed and frustrated right now.”

“Japan has been voting the shark proposals down because they are catching them, Singapore voted them down because they make money selling the fins and China makes money because they eat them,” he said. “How can we win?”

The Pew Environmental Group said the sharks are especially vulnerable to overfishing because they are slow growing and have low reproductive rates. Fishermen, both industrial and small-scale and many operating illegally, slice off the fins and throw the carcasses back in the ocean.

Shark fin soup has long played central part in traditional Chinese culture, often being served at weddings and banquets. Demand for the soup has surged as increasing numbers of Chinese middle class family become wealthier.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.