‘Public interest the only justification for use of surveillance as news source’

February 05, 2014 10:52 pm | Updated May 18, 2016 06:13 am IST - CHENNAI:

(From right) K.N. Shanth Kumar, Editor, Prajavani; Kalpesh Yagnik, National Editor, Dainik Bhaskar; and Krishna Prasad, Editor-In-Chief, Outlook, at the media meet organised by WANIFRA in Chennai on Wednesday. Photo: R. Ragu

(From right) K.N. Shanth Kumar, Editor, Prajavani; Kalpesh Yagnik, National Editor, Dainik Bhaskar; and Krishna Prasad, Editor-In-Chief, Outlook, at the media meet organised by WANIFRA in Chennai on Wednesday. Photo: R. Ragu

Overriding public interest is the sole justification for the use of surveillance as a method to source information in journalism, senior editors said here at a conference on Wednesday.

Addressing a roundtable at the 3rd Digital Media India meet hosted by the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers, South Asia, Krishna Prasad, Editor-in-Chief of Outlook , urged the media to stop the “self-flagellation” on the issue and wondered whether it was right when the government, the bureaucracy (as in the Radia tapes issue), the Army (during the Kargil war) or even retailers — who used CCTV footage — resorted to surveillance.

Whistleblowers’ message

The big message from whistleblowers like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden was for journalism to adopt more aggressive means of sourcing information, he said.

Kalpesh Yagnik, National Editor, Dainik Bhaskar , said pursuit of truth and service of public interest overrode everything else in the practice of journalism.

K.N. Shanth Kumar, Editor of Prajavani , felt technology needed to be dealt with care as it was essentially a two-edged weapon — facilitating surveillance but also increasing the vulnerability of journalists to digital snooping.

Chairing the session, N. Ravi, Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu , said while editorial decisions on how to use, or whether to use at all, any information sourced through surveillance had to be governed by the principle of public interest, practitioners of journalism needed to remind themselves that public interest did not denote just what the public is interested in, but represented the larger common good.

Earlier, in his keynote address, Michael Maness, Vice President of Journalism and Media Innovation at the Knight Foundation, U.S., pointed to the speed of disruption occurring in the industry and wanted journalists to be aware that the article was no longer the end-product and that “the threads of their work were as important as the finished cloth.”

The new media experience also showed that for news publishers, social media that was based on telling stories and sharing them, could prove more valuable than search engines, though on social media it was often the case that compelling headlines trumped the brand itself, he said. The conference featured case studies and experience-sharing from international media companies such as VG, Norway, and Beritasatu Media Holdings, Indonesia, that publishes the Jakarta Globe .

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.