Pak court adjourns 26/11 case to May 22

May 09, 2010 08:38 am | Updated November 28, 2021 09:00 pm IST - Islamabad

The iconic Taj Mahal hotel, one of the targets of terrorists on 26/11. Photo: K.R. Deepak

The iconic Taj Mahal hotel, one of the targets of terrorists on 26/11. Photo: K.R. Deepak

A Pakistani court conducting the trial of LeT's operations chief Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and six other suspects in the Mumbai attack case adjourned proceedings till May 22 after the prosecution sought more time to gain access to Ajmal Kasab, sentenced to death by an Indian court.

Judge Malik Muhammad Akram Awan of the Rawalpindi-based anti-terrorism court put off the case for two weeks after the prosecution filed an application asking him not to proceed till Pakistani authorities gained access to Kasab and Fahim Ansari, an Indian national who was accused of involvement in the attacks but acquitted by the Indian court.

The prosecution said in its application that the Pakistan government had requested India to grant access to Kasab and Ansari.

It also said the arrest warrants issued for Kasab and Ansari by the anti-terrorism court had been provided to Indian authorities.

The prosecution also asked the court to take action against Kasab and Ansari under Article 87 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The article states that if a person against whom a warrant has been issued is absconding, the court can publish a written proclamation requiring him to appear at a specified place and time within 30 days.

Lawyers defending the seven suspects, including Lakhvi, filed an application in which they claimed the government was resorting to various tactics to delay the trial.

Among these tactics is seeking access to Kasab, the application contended.

The application filed by the defence lawyers also noted that Kasab had been convicted and sentenced by a “competent court” in India and could not be tried for the same offence under Pakistani laws.

Khwaja Sultan, the lawyer for Lakhvi, told PTI that Article 403 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 13 of the Pakistani Constitution clearly stated that a person could not be tried twice for the same offence.

He said these provisions would apply to Kasab, who is a Pakistani national.

Article 403 of the CrPC states that a person, once convicted or acquitted, cannot be tried again for the same

offence. Article 13 of the Constitution makes it clear that no person will be prosecuted or punished for the same offence more than once.

Judge Awan issued notices to the prosecution and defence to respond to each other's applications and put off the case till May 22.

The trial of the Pakistani suspects, which got underway in April last year, has been mired in controversy and legal complications over the past few months.

The defence lawyers have filed a raft of cases challenging the trial.

The Supreme Court is currently hearing a petition filed by Lakhvi seeking his acquittal.

The apex court has sought a copy of Kasab's confessional statement and will take up the matter again on May 11.

The seven suspects – Lakhvi, Zarar Shah, Hamad Amin Sadiq, Shahid Jamil Riaz, Younas Anjum, Abu al-Qama and Jamil Ahmed – have been charged with planning and facilitating the attacks in Mumbai that killed 166 people.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.