“Withdraw Judicial Appointments Commission Bill”

Calls for strengthening existing collegium system for appointment of judges

October 16, 2013 01:16 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:22 pm IST - New Delhi:

The Bar Council of India has urged the Centre to withdraw the Judic-ial Appointments Commission Bill providing for constitution of a National Judicial Commission for appointment of judges of High Courts and the Supreme Court as it interfered with the judiciary’s independence and would affect the basic structure of the Constitution.

BCI chairman Manan Kumar Mishra and co-chairman S. Prabakaran also opposed the 120th Constitutional Amendment Bill to amend Articles 124 and 217 on appointment of judges. The Judicial Appointm-ents Commission Bill provides for constitution of the JAC comprising the Chief Justice of India, an ex officio chairperson; two Supreme Court judges next to the CJI in seniority as ex officio members; the Union Law Minister and two eminent persons, to be nomina-ted by the collegium consisting of the PM, the CJI and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, as members. The Secretary, Department of Law will be the convener.

The BCI said the constitution of the NJC would itself show that the appointments would be made by the government and the executive and this would affect the independence of the judiciary and the basic structure of the Constitution. The Bill would only weaken the judiciary.

It said the existing collegium system had been functioning well. However, it needed to be more transparent and the mechanism of the appointment should be strengthened.

The Bar Council pointed out that when the Supreme Court had evolved the collegium system through its judgment in 1993 and reaffirmed it in 1998, the government had not even bothered to seek a clarification or review of the system and had introduced the two Bills despite strong objections voiced by the Bar. The BCI suggested setting up of a Central Advisory Committee comprising the PM or his/her nominee or the Union Law Minister; the Leader of the Opposition in either of the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha or his nominee; the Attorney-General or the Solicitor-General; a representative of the Bar Counc-il of India and a representative of the Supreme Court Bar Association.

The committee might be formed by the apex court itself to aid and advise the collegium for appointment of Supreme Court judges.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.