Will pictorial warnings come into effect from June 1?

Seek instructions from Centre, CJI tells Solicitor-General

January 07, 2011 02:01 am | Updated November 17, 2021 03:23 am IST - NEW DELHI:

The Supreme Court on Thursday asked Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam to seek instructions from the Centre whether the new pictorial warnings on tobacco products would be brought into effect from June 1, 2011, as per the December 20, 2010 notification.

Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia, heading a three-judge Bench, also questioned the intentions of the new notification issued by the Health Ministry.

The Bench, which included Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar, was hearing petitions filed by the Health for Millions Trust challenging the new notification deferring the implementation till June 1.

Senior counsel Anand Grover, appearing for the petitioner, said the pictorial warnings were to be rotated every year as stated in Rule 5 of the Packaging and Labelling Rules 2008. In pursuance of the mandate of law, the Union of India issued a notification, dated March 5, 2010, stating the warnings would be rotated on June 1, 2010. However, on May 17, 2010, the implementation date was extended to December 1, 2010.

Mr. Grover argued that the Centre — realising it did not have the power to extend the implementation date — issued a notification on December 20, 2010 amending Rule 5 and prescribing a two-year period of rotation. The amendment was made ex-post facto cover up an illegality, namely the notification extending the effective date to June 1, 2010, and there was no power to issue a corrigendum. The warning had been extended time and again since 2006, at the behest of tobacco companies, counsel alleged.

Even assuming that the December 20, 2010 notification was good in the eyes of law, the rotation of pictorial warnings should come into effect from June 1, 2011, Mr. Grover said.

It was in this context that the CJI wanted the Solicitor-General to take instructions from the Centre. He pointed out that the matter had already been adjourned several times, and every time the court was told that all arguments of violation of Articles 19(1) (a) and 21 were academic and that the warnings would be brought into force on December 1, 2010. Further hearing is posted to January 31.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.