‘Beheading of a soldier is gruesome and most unpardonable’
Terming as “most unpardonable’’ the beheading of an Indian Army soldier on the Line of Control (LoC) in Poonch area of Jammu and Kashmir by Pakistani Army regulars on January 8, Army Chief General Bikram Singh on Monday warned that India’s military will retaliate aggressively if provoked any further.
In a measured but tough response to Pakistani Army killing two Indian soldiers on January 8, the Army Chief said the Pakistani troops had “pre-planned and pre-meditated’’ the action and asserted that India reserves the right to retaliate at a “time and place of its choice.’’
Addressing the annual press conference here on the eve of the 65th Army Day, General Singh said that he expected his commander to be aggressive and offensive. “I do not want my commanders to be timid. Our response to Pakistani firing at its posts in LoC in Jammu and Kashmir is measured and perfect.”
The Army chief said the ceasefire on the LoC, in place since November 26, 2003, has been holding barring “some aberrations’’ in some sectors where the Pakistani side indulged in violations. He pointed out that it was a tactical level operation which was localised on two sectors in LoC, a 740-km long zig-zag line passing through mountainous region of Jammu and Kashmir.
“We will uphold the ceasefire as long as adversary upholds it but we will not be passive when provoked or fired at,’’ he added. Last year there had been 117 ceasefire violations from Pakistani side. However, he said that entire LoC was not “activated’’ but only some sectors where violations, skirmishes and infiltration took place.
“Beheading of a soldier is gruesome, unacceptable and most unpardonable,’’ General Singh said while referring to the January 8 incident in Mendhar sector of Poonch area in Jammu region where an Indian Army patrol party was ambushed by Pakistani troops who had crossed over to the Indian territory. He said the Pakistani act “defies all logic’’ and was “against all ethics of soldiering.’’
Replying to a question, he said the attack was carried out by Pakistani Army regulars but agreed with the possibility of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorists being involved in it. “Pakistan uses terrorists for operations. We cannot rule out the possibility. We have known them to use that,’’ he added.
He said the Army had inputs that Pakistan’s elite commandos, the Special Service Group (SSG), was also involved in the cross border raid in which Lance Naik Hemraj was beheaded and the body of Lance Naik Sudhakar Singh was mutilated. He said that 91 Army personnel of all ranks had made supreme sacrifice of laying down their lives over the past one year while defending the nation in the line of their duty.
Asked if he would visit the family of Lance Naik Hemraj, the Army Chief replied in affirmative, saying as head of the family he would go to express his sympathies and offer condolences.
Denying Pakistani allegations that the tension along the LoC was triggered by Indian Army’s aggression on January 6, General Singh said that Pakistan first tried to spread “lies’’ and then `”tried to justify the beheading.’’
General Singh denied that any concrete structure was built by the Indian Army in the area near Charonda village where Pakistani forces dominated with small arms and mortar fire.
Keywords: India-Pakistan border tension, cross-LoC firing, Brigade Commander-level flag meeting, Poonch sector, ceasefire violations, General Bikram Singh







This is unacceptable and our government can not be so soft. I go with Sushma's statement to get 10 heads from that side.Do we have to wait for them to take one more head from our side to react on this??...
The killing of two soldiers is a provacation. Are we expecting one more provacation to respond?
The Hindu publicized an article that said the army erected some structure that made
pakistan fire at us, now the army chief himself denies this. The Hindu being a
responsible paper should show extreme caution when it comes to national security
and not be swayed by wrong impressions of fact reporting based on hearsay.
No more statements. Army personnel should not cater to media statements. Only
executives and defence ministry, foreign officials have to make and should be allowed.
We could see the weakness in response by those who have to make real statements.Let us show in action like how we demonstrated in Kargil. Let the country notforget how Pak shivered when we made announcements to move warships.
Pakistanis know fully well that present day India does not have the guts to escalate tensions into a full-fledged conflict. The nuclear equation has completely handicapped the Government's options. India did not react when Pakistani terrorists literally invaded Mumbai and killed 200+ people. All we accomplished after that tragedy was to hang Kasab and beg that Pakistan hand over the masterminds to us. International community is never going to consider us a serious power unless we know how to dictate terms to our neighbours
So, does the Army chief accept that whatever Pakistan has done so far is not provocative?
What kind of men are leading India?
Loss of life of a soldier in war or a battle can be valor. Loss of a jawan's life at sensitive border post during peace time is poor planning. The COAS knows this very well. The wisdom is never give a chance to the enemy to surprise you.
seriously? please wake up or else you will end of saying the same
sentence after every attack....God save india
It is fine even if we go few years back rather than killed every day! DECISION TIME. Definitely Government and Army are capable to deal with International community and enemy.
The Army Chief's response is laudable. Pakistan has to be made to realise that it will a heavy price to pay for any misadventures.
This killing of one or two soldiers (by each side) is a failure of communication. The soldiers on both sides are stressed for nothing. Basically India-Pakistan relations are characterised by the word "Ego". Once you tackle it, it can be done!
By the way, thanks to this incident, the Indian public has forgotten Nirbhaya-Damini (The girl gang raped in a moving bus in New Delhi). Just like one nail drives out a nail - the issue is now buried.
Was the India-Pakistan "issue" manufactured to bury the Nirbhaya-Damini gang rape storm ?
The remark "India reserves its right to retaliate at a time and place of its choice…” is laudable. India needs to handle the issue with aplomb wielding both the stick and carrot leaving Islamabad in no doubt that the real choice for them lies inchoosing between truce and confrontation. Returning a shelling at the same point is like an eyefor an eye that ends up in making both blind.
Please Email the Editor