Death row convicts’ kin should be informed in advance: Altamas Kabir

Defends collegium system of appointment of judges

April 07, 2013 03:02 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 08:17 pm IST - New Delhi

NEW DELHI, April 07, 2013:: Chief Justice of Supreme court, Justice Altamash Kabir at the Joint conference of Chief Justice of High Courts and Chief Ministers, presided by Prime  Minister Manmohan Singh, organized by Ministry of Law and Justice after 4 yrs , in New Delhi  on April 07, 2013.  Photo Rajeev Bhatt.

NEW DELHI, April 07, 2013:: Chief Justice of Supreme court, Justice Altamash Kabir at the Joint conference of Chief Justice of High Courts and Chief Ministers, presided by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, organized by Ministry of Law and Justice after 4 yrs , in New Delhi on April 07, 2013. Photo Rajeev Bhatt.

Family members of convicts whose mercy petitions have been dismissed by the President must be informed when the convicts would be executed, Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir said on Sunday.

“As a matter of principle, the family members should be informed as to when the thing [execution] happens,” he said at a press conference after the all-India Chief Justices conference on April 5 and 6 and the meeting of the Chief Ministers and the CJs of 24 High Courts. Union Law Minister Ashwani Kumar was present.

Asked whether Parliament attack case convict Afzal Guru’s family members ought to have been informed of his execution, the CJI said, “They should have been informed.”

On delay in disposal of mercy petitions by the President, the Law Minister said: “Let us not talk about the past. There has to be expeditious disposal of mercy pleas, and recently the President has disposed of a large number of such pleas. A system is being evolved for expeditious disposal keeping in mind the judicial decisions.” He, however, declined to comment on the Afzal Guru issue. To a question, the CJI said: “generally, courts should not interfere in policy decisions unless they are contrary to constitutional guarantees or against the law.”

He defended the collegium system of appointment of judges. “Different agencies are involved in the consultation process and a lot of deliberations take place within the members of the collegium and outside before a person is chosen as a judge. Without knowing the working of the system, one should not comment on it.”

On the judicial standards and accountability Bill providing for penalising judges making oral observations, he said: “The Bill is pending consideration in the Rajya Sabha. I would not like to comment on it.” However, he agreed that when the point was not connected with the dispute, there should not be unnecessary oral observations.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.