VHP insists on 3 ‘P’s for temple

They are PM, Parliament and people.

March 25, 2017 11:00 pm | Updated March 26, 2017 02:09 am IST

JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, 12/02/2016: VHP Leader Praveen Togadia during a meeting in Jaipur on February 12, 2016. Photo: Rohit Jain Paras

JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, 12/02/2016: VHP Leader Praveen Togadia during a meeting in Jaipur on February 12, 2016. Photo: Rohit Jain Paras

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), reiterating its demand for a new law for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya, has put the onus of that move entirely on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP-led governments at the Centre and Uttar Pradesh.

Upping the ante on its demand, the VHP will convene a meeting of saints in Haridwar between May 31 and June 2 with the sole agenda of discussing the temple issue.

“We will be calling a meeting of sants in Haridwar in June, but no Dharma Sansad [the original congress of saints that first passed a resolution for a Ram Temple in Ayodhya in 1984] will again discuss the issue till we can see the beginning of the construction process,” said VHP president Praveen Togadia.

He said VHP workers would raise the demand for the construction of the temple in 5,000 places across the country between April 1 and 16 during nationwide Ram Mahostsav celebrations.

Constitutional route

“We want a Constitutional route to temple construction, which can only be done through the three ‘P’s — the Prime Minister, Parliament and the people,” Mr. Togadia said.

He added that the template for the construction of the temple would be based on the reconstruction of the Somnath Temple after independence. “The statements and conversations that went on between Sardar Patel, Babu Rajendra Prasad and K.M. Munshi is instructive in this regard,” he said.

Last week the Supreme Court had suggested an out-of-court settlement to the dispute between the parties involved. While the BJP had welcomed the move, the VHP had released a statement sticking to its demand for a law that would enable the construction of a Ram Temple in Ayodhya.

Palampur resolution

On Saturday, Mr. Togadia refused to make any personal comments on Prime Minister Modi or Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.

Instead he frequently invoked the BJP’s Palampur resolution of 1986, when the party had decided to support the Ram Janmabhoomi movement, the fact that the issue has appeared in every BJP manifesto for the Centre and U.P. since and the role of Yogi Adityanath’s guru, Mahant Avaidyanath, who was at the helm of the movement.

“The BJP passed this resolution two years after the Dharma Sansad held its first meeting at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi. And it has been mentioned in every BJP manifesto after the 1986 Palampur resolution. We hope that Prime Minister Modi, and the BJP will remember their resolve,” he said. “Mahant Avaidyanath, Ramkrishna Paramhans (of the Ramjanmabhoomi Nyas) and Ashok Singhalji all departed the world without seeing the temple, we hope Prime Minister Modi and Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Yogi Adityanath will make it possible,” he added.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.