UPA, NDA colluding to dilute land Bill, says Medha Patkar

“Doing away with Social Impact Assessment for irrigation projects not acceptable”

September 05, 2013 01:29 am | Updated November 16, 2021 09:18 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) on Wednesday hit out at the United Progressive Alliance and the National Democratic Alliance charging them with “colluding” to dilute some of the progressive provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2013.

Alleging a “quid pro quo” between the UPA and the NDA for getting the legislation passed, the Alliance said not to make the Social Impact Assessment (SIA) applicable to irrigation projects and to further dilute the land-for-land provision for displaced people in irrigation projects were “not acceptable” and “will be challenged at every level.”

The removal of the retrospective clause would hurt the farmers, workers, Dalits and tribals most who were awaiting compensation.

“The provisions had been included as a result of a three-decades struggle against 30 big dams, 135 medium dams and 3,000 small dams on the Narmada and its tributaries in the riparian States of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Gujarat. Together, these dams affect nearly 5 million people who have been uprooted, displaced or have suffered loss of livelihood and mode of life,” said NAPM convener Medha Patkar.

“To take out the SIA is most shocking,” said Himanshu Thakker of SANDRP. “Even the World Bank recognises that there should be Social Impact Assessment of irrigation projects,” he told The Hindu.

The NAPM is a conglomeration of several people’s movements in various States.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.