SEARCH

News » National

Updated: September 6, 2011 02:26 IST

Timely resignation saves Justice Sen from untimely ouster

New Delhi Bureau
Comment (4)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Calcutta High Court judge Soumitra Sen leaves the Rajya Sabha after defending himself during the impeachment proceedings against him. File photo
The Hindu
Calcutta High Court judge Soumitra Sen leaves the Rajya Sabha after defending himself during the impeachment proceedings against him. File photo

Despite being tantalisingly close to completion, a new chapter in India's judicial history was abandoned half-written with the Lok Sabha on Monday dropping impeachment proceedings against Calcutta High Court Judge Soumitra Sen. The Rajya Sabha had voted on August 18 to oust the judge but his smartly timed resignation — submitted to the President on Saturday, two days before the Lower House's scheduled debate and vote on the matter — effectively meant there was no one left for Parliament to impeach.

Since an earlier faxed resignation sent by Mr. Sen was deemed invalid, the Law Ministry on Sunday notified the handwritten resignation of the judge — an unusual procedure for persons holding constitutional posts — so as to end all speculation on his continuing judicial status.

After Law and Justice Minister Salman Khursheed informed the Lok Sabha of Justice Sen's resignation, which was accepted by President Pratibha Patil on Saturday, Speaker Meira Kumar sought the “sense of the House” to drop the proceedings against the judge. The members gave their consent by voice vote.

“Is it the sense of the House that we may not proceed with agenda item no. 12 [of Monday's business],” the Speaker asked the members.

As per the agenda, the House had wanted to address to the President, through a motion, for the removal of the judge for — misappropriation of large sums of money, which he received in his capacity as Receiver appointed by the Calcutta High Court; and misrepresenting facts with regard to the misappropriation of money before the High Court.

Earlier in the day, Leader of the Lok Sabha and Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee had hectic consultations with Mr. Khursheed, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal and senior officials on the issue. The Speaker too had similar meetings with the government and the political parties.

Last month, Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Sitaram Yechury moved the motion of impeachment in the Rajya Sabha against Justice Sen for misappropriating Rs. 33.23 lakh in a 1983 case when he was appointed Receiver by the High Court. When put to vote, 189 members supported the motion and 16 opposed it, after the judge, who was standing in the bar placed in the Upper House, mounted a strong defence.

Had he not resigned, the Lok Sabha would likely have delivered a similar verdict and Soumitra Sen would have become the first judge impeached by Parliament in India.

More In: National | News

This is the 'first of its kind' case wherein a constitutional functionery has to resort to a tactic of resigning midway during an impeachment proceedings in the Parliament only to avoid the ignominy of becoming the first casualty as a result thereof. This has now raised an issue for debate as to why not there be a provision of penalty in such cases in order to avoid recurrence of such selective move by the person being impeached, particularly when one House has already passed the impeachment motion and only after taking a cue therefrom and just before the same proceedings are listed to be taken up in the other House, the person resigns. What about the time already wasted in such proceedings in one House? In my opinion, if one House has already passed the impeachment motion, the person being impeached should not be allowed to resign midway before the same proceedings are completed in the other House too. Let the other House also complete the impeachment proceedings.

from:  Nandan Jimiwal
Posted on: Sep 6, 2011 at 12:12 IST

Is that all. The judge's wrong doing ends with his resignation? Why not criminal action against him. If he were a typical government servant not only he would have been dismissed, but also would have been proceeded against criminally. The concept of 'double jeopardy' is given the go-by in such government servant cases. But then a judge is special person? Will the Supreme court look into this? Any legal 'luminary' will clarfy this?

from:  R.M.Murthy
Posted on: Sep 6, 2011 at 10:42 IST

How can we let somebody go..like this...!!!!!Everybody knows that he deserved to be punished....!!!but just because he resigned at the right time.. does not free him off his charges..!!Some stringent action should be taken against him...

from:  Amey
Posted on: Sep 6, 2011 at 09:33 IST

The judges are expected to be societal role models. While democractically elected Parliaments can overturn the system to bring in judicial neutrality, it should be unbiased and free of political influences / preferences.

from:  S Rajagopalan Houston TX
Posted on: Sep 6, 2011 at 03:07 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

International

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

15 States ratify National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill

It is expected to usher in transparency in judicial appointments in the highest courts »