Writ petition challenging crop loan waiver dismissed

December 03, 2014 02:37 am | Updated April 07, 2016 02:26 am IST - HYDERABAD:

A Division Bench of the Hyderabad High Court comprising Chief Justice Kalyan Jyothi Sengupta and Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar on Tuesday dismissed a writ petition filed challenging the crop loan waiver scheme in AP and Telangana, saying the petition was premature.

The Bench was dealing with a case filed by J. Ram Mohan Chowdary, a resident here, seeking stay on implementation of the crop loan waiver scheme in AP and Telangana States, saying it was unconstitutional. The bench pointed out that no material was placed on record and that this was premature and dismissed the case.

Re-determining compensation for land

Justice P. Naveen Rao of Hyderabad High Court on Tuesday declared that the compensation component of the award passed after January, 2014 under the provisions of old Land Acquisition Act, 1894 while taking the property of the citizens had to be re-determined afresh in view of new law passed in 2013. He was allowing a batch of writ petitions filed by many persons from the twin cities who were losing properties to facilitate the Hyderabad Metro Rail. People whose properties were in Ameerpet and Secunderabad complained to the court that the final award fixing the compensation to be paid to them for the loss of properties was passed recently, after January 2014.

They averred that they were entitled for better compensation under provisions of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The respondent authorities argued that the notification and inquiry were under the old Land Acquisition Act and the provisions of new Act could not be pressed into service now.

Justice Naveen Rao said the process of land acquisition need not begin afresh but the Acquisition Officer had to re-determine the compensation amounts. He was directed to issue notices to the petitioners, look into claims made by them in the light of beneficial provisions of the new 2013 Act, hear them and then pass award afresh. After the money was paid, the person whose properties were acquired will have four weeks’ time to vacate the premises.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.