Tatra truck deal: ED sends LRs to U.K., Hong Kong

February 17, 2013 02:11 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 11:51 pm IST - New Delhi

A view of Tatra vehicles. File photo

A view of Tatra vehicles. File photo

Speeding up its probe in a controversial defence deal that had surfaced last year, the Enforcement Directorate has recently sent judicial requests to the U.K. and Hong Kong in connection with its money laundering probe in the Tatra truck deal.

The agency has dispatched the requests, called Letters Rogatory (LRs) in judicial terminology, after a special court here recently allowed its request in this regard.

The ED has registered a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in April last year against Vectra Chairman Ravi Rishi and few other firms after former Army chief Gen V.K. Singh had alleged that he was offered a Rs. 14 crore bribe in September, 2010 to clear the purchase of a tranche of 1,676 Tatra trucks for the army.

The LRs, according to sources, have been sent to the UK as Tatra Sipox is based there and Rishi is a Director of the firm, while the one to Hong Kong has been sent to authorities as a firm -- Venus Projects -- held substantial shares (50 per cent till 2009) in the same firm (Tatra Sipox).

The ED wants to know the company structure, its business dealings in India and across the globe and the share holding patterns of these firms through the LRs which will be executed by local enforcement authorities of these two countries, they said.

In a nearly year-long probe, the ED has gathered vital information about business operations of Tatra Sipox in India and the dealing of its executives with officials of the Defence Ministry and the army.

The LRs to the two countries have also requested for banking transactions and other regular business filings of the firms with the respective regulatory bodies there, they said.

The CBI has alleged that Tatra Sipox UK signed the truck supply deal with defence PSU Bharat Earth Movers Ltd which was in alleged violation of defence procurement rules. The rules state that procurement should be done directly from original equipment manufacturer only.

It has alleged that since Tatra Sipox UK was not the original manufacturer of these all—terrain trucks, the rule that defence procurements should be made from original manufacturer was allegedly violated.

On its part, the ED is looking into transactions carried out by Tatra Sipox UK in countries like Slovakia, Czech Republic and Lichtenstein.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.