UPSC finds no foul play by TNPSC exam candidates

May 07, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:58 am IST - NEW DELHI:

A Union Public Service Commission report on Wednesday favoured 65 candidates, appointed as Group I officers, who are under Supreme Court scanner for alleged foul play in their Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission exams.

The candidates are alleged to have committed various violations while taking their test, including using a sketch pen, pencil, two colours, and making irrelevant markings.

A Bench led by Justice Anil R. Dave had in January sought the UPSC’s help on an application by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) for modifying a July 2014 apex court order quashing the appointments made.

The Supreme Court had upheld a Madras High Court’s order setting aside the selection and appointment of the candidates because of exam malpractices in 2000-2001.

However, in a hearing on Wednesday, the Bench found that though the UPSC prima facie found that the candidates had violated TNPSC exam rules, the pencil markings on the answer sheets did not translate into any attempt by candidates to reveal their identity, communicate with or influence the examiners.

Justice Dave, on perusing the report, orally observed that “whatever the UPSC has sent is final”.

However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, arguing for some of the other candidates who had challenged the exam results, said the Supreme Court’s acceptance of the UPSC opinion would amount to a “travesty of justice”. The public would lose confidence in the judiciary as this was a case in which the State Public Service Commission connived with the candidates under scanner, he said.

Of a total 91 candidates, 15 opted for other jobs, three died, eight of them found qualified for selection in re-evaluation and 65 are left.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhawan submitted that the Supreme Court Bench’s choice to have the UPSC examine TNPSC exam results was “strange and extremely unusual”.

“The UPSC is not an appellate body of the TNPSC,” Mr. Dhawan submitted.

Justice Dipak Misra, the second judge on the Bench, however clarified that the UPSC was only involved as a “verification body”. “We only sought its assistance,” Justice Misra said.

The court gave the TNPSC and the challengers two weeks to file their response to the UPSC report and scheduled the case for hearing on August 19.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.