Tribunal order enables petitioner to get dual pension

June 15, 2013 11:13 am | Updated November 16, 2021 09:40 pm IST - CHENNAI:

The Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, has passed an order that will pave the way for several families of retired defence employees to get pension from both the army and the organisation that may have re-employed them after retirement or discharge.

Disposing of an application by Vasantha of Bodinayakanur, the Bench, comprising Justice V. Periya Karuppiah and Lt. Gen. Anand Mohan Verma said, “As per a notification of the Union government issued in 2001, she is entitled to pension both from the re-employed department and the army.”

Vasantha (61) is the widow of havildar S. Rajamani, who was enrolled in the army in 1963. Her husband was discharged from service in 1983 and received defence pension. After discharge, he was re-employed in Canara Bank as a clerk. He died in harness in 1997. Upon his death, she began receiving family pension from the bank. However, the army rejected her plea for defence pension too, citing the fact that she was getting family pension from the bank.

Vasantha submitted that she had three children and was finding it difficult to maintain her family with the bank’s pension as the lone source of income. She argued that she was entitled to receive family pension both from the bank and the army in accordance with existing policies of the Union government. She wanted the tribunal to ask the authorities to grant the benefit of dual pension, with interest.

Counsel for the army submitted that as per a government order of January 17 this year, the families of armed forces pensioners who get re-employment in Central civil departments or state government/public sector undertakings would be entitled to draw two family pensions. However, these provisions were applicable only to personnel discharged from service from September 24, 2012, and thus, the petitioner should not claim relief based on this provision.

Even while agreeing with his contention, the AFT said, “The provisions of the notification issued in 2001 also hold good. It clearly establishes that the applicant is eligible for double pension.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.