Review panel to decide on security for Ramadoss, Anbumani

September 06, 2013 06:53 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:21 am IST - Chennai

A view of the Madras High Court. File photo: V. Ganesan

A view of the Madras High Court. File photo: V. Ganesan

The Madras High Court on Friday directed the Tamil Nadu Home Secretary to convene a meeting of Security Review Committee (SRC) and take a decision by September 30 with regard to the threat perception of PMK leaders S. Ramadoss and Anbumani Ramadoss. The decision should be in the light of their sworn affidavits that there was a serious threat to their lives.

Justice K.K. Sasidharan passed the order on a plea by PMK president G.K. Mani for a direction to the authorities to provide adequate police protection to Dr. Ramadoss and Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss, who is a former Union Minister.

The petitioner said that the government had earlier provided police protection for the two leaders considering the threat perception. However, the security cover was abruptly withdrawn in April . A representation was made to the Home Secretary in July to restore protection. As the government failed to take any action, he approached the court, Mr. Mani said.

Counsel submitted that police protection was withdrawn due to political reasons.

The government contended that the two leaders misused the security and indulged in violence. Only the SRC was the appropriate authority to decide the threat perception.

Mr. Justice Sasidharan said the petitioner now apprehended that there was serious threat to the lives of the two leaders after the Marakkanam incident on April 25. The two had filed separate affidavits indicating the need for police protection for them.

He said the decision to withdraw security was taken by the SRC on May 20, 2011. The unfortunate incidents at Dharmapuri and (riots) and Marakkanam took place only thereafter. There was an ongoing dispute and difference of opinion between two political parties as a consequence of these incidents. The threat perception required to be decided in the light of background facts. The security concern raised by the two leaders should be considered taking into account the recent violence and possible repercussion.

Mr. Justice Sasidharan said there was nothing on record to show that the SRC met after withdrawing security for the two. There was no recent review of security perception by the SRC. Hence, he was of the considered opinion that the situation warranted the committee’s review.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.