Supreme Court stays death sentence in bus burning case

January 28, 2011 02:04 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:24 pm IST - New Delhi

FOR SALEM 25/4/2008: The ill-fated Tamil Nadu Agriculture University bus, in which three girl students were burnt alive during a mob violence in Dharmapuri on February 2, 2000, was taken to Coimbatore from the salem court complex on Friday. Photo: P_Goutham

FOR SALEM 25/4/2008: The ill-fated Tamil Nadu Agriculture University bus, in which three girl students were burnt alive during a mob violence in Dharmapuri on February 2, 2000, was taken to Coimbatore from the salem court complex on Friday. Photo: P_Goutham

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the death sentence of the accused – Nedunchezhian, Ravindran and Muniappan – in the Dharmapuri bus burning incident, in which three college girls were killed. The death sentence, awarded by a trial court, was confirmed by the Madras High Court and the Supreme Court.

A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy and S.S. Nijjar, after hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal for the petitioners, also stayed execution of the sentence, while entertaining a writ petition filed by the three pleading for stay of the sentence on the ground that a petition seeking review of the August 30, 2010 judgment was still pending disposal.

Kokilavani, Gayathri and Hemalatha of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, were travelling along with 44 other students and two teachers, in the bus when it was torched on February 2, 2000, following the conviction of AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa in a case.

A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and B.S. Chauhan had expressed shock at the brutality of the incident and upheld the death sentence.

In the present writ petition, Muniappan and two others stated that all review petitions filed in death sentence cases should be heard in open court (normally they are heard in judge's chamber) with oral arguments and, if necessary, Supreme Court Rules, 1966, should be amended to bring about that change.

Further the petition said that as per the Law Commission's recommendation, all death penalty matter in the Supreme Court should be heard by a Bench of five judges by amending relevant Rules. It said that as recently as on November 19, 2010, the Supreme Court allowed a review petition in Ramdeo Chauhan vs Bani Kant Das, which if not allowed, would have resulted in the review petitioner being executed.

Hence all such matters should be heard by a five-judge Bench as the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.