Sasikala moves SC seeking review of DA case judgment

Argues that the case has died with the death of the sole public servant

May 03, 2017 11:09 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 10:46 pm IST - New Delhi

CHENNAI, 08/02/2017 : For Tamil Nadu Desk : AIADMK, general secretary V.K. Sasikala waving to a crowd before attending the urgent meeting of the party legislators at the party headquarters in Chennai on Wednesday. Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam

CHENNAI, 08/02/2017 : For Tamil Nadu Desk : AIADMK, general secretary V.K. Sasikala waving to a crowd before attending the urgent meeting of the party legislators at the party headquarters in Chennai on Wednesday. Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam

V.K. Sasikala and two co-accused in the Jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case on Wednesday moved a review petition in the Supreme Court against their conviction .

Sasikala, J. Ilavarasi and V.N. Sudhakaran argued that since the case against the main accused and sole public servant in the corruption case, former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, had abated, the charges against them should also abate. They argued that the case died with the death of the sole public servant and a corruption case cannot be sustained against private citizens.

The court had in a detailed judgment on February 14 indicted Jayalalithaa , albeit posthumously, of having criminally conspired with then aide Sasikala at her Poes Garden residence to launder ill-gotten wealth.

However, while setting aside the Karnataka High Court's acquittal of Sasikala and two co-accused in the 20-year-old disproportionate assets case, the Supreme Court said the appeals filed by Karnataka government and others, including DMK leader K. Anbazhagan, against Jayalalithaa stands abated with her death on December 5, 2016.

A Bench of Justices P.C. Ghose and Amitava Roy had "restored in toto" the trial court's conviction of Sasikala, Ilavarasi and Sudhakaran in September 2014, and ordered them to surrender forthwith.

Even after Sasikala comes out after serving her four-year sentence, she would be disqualified to contest elections for the next six years as per the Supreme Court judgment in Lily Thomas versus Union of India of July 2013.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.