Officials to discuss dismal child sex ratio in Puducherry

March 12, 2013 09:57 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 03:54 am IST - PUDUCHERRY:

Chief Minister N. Rangasamy chairing the supervisory board meeting to findways to curb sex-selective abortions. Photo: T. Singaravelou

Chief Minister N. Rangasamy chairing the supervisory board meeting to findways to curb sex-selective abortions. Photo: T. Singaravelou

The child sex ratio (for ages 0 to 6) in the Union Territory has fallen from 967 girls for every 1,000 boys in 2001, to 965 girls for every 1,000 boys in 2011.

In order to improve this ratio, the health officials from the Union Territory will be meeting health and family welfare officials from the neighbouring States of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Kerala.

According to a study conducted by the Pondicherry University, the people from the Union Territory visit places in Tamil Nadu in order to have sex-selective abortions. "It is for this reason that a meeting with the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act enforcement officials from neighbouring States is necessary," said V.V. Rao, Deputy Director of Family Welfare.

The issue was brought up before Chief Minister N. Rangasamy at the Union Territory Supervisory Board Meeting on Monday and the process to fix the meetings will start soon, he said.

According to sources, the amendments made to the PCPNDT Act were also discussed. In this regard, the registration fees for new ultrasound centres would be increased from Rs. 4000 to Rs. 10,000. The same would apply for new genetic clinics as well. The Central Supervisory Board, however, had fixed the rates at Rs. 25,000 for new ultrasound centres and Rs. 35,000 for new genetic clinics. The rates in the Union Territory may be increased in the coming years.

At present, there are a total of 79 ultrasound and genetic clinics in the Union Territory.

Another change that would be made was that doctors who had completed their MBBS and six months of post graduation in radiology would be allowed to practice as a radiologist.

Another point that was discussed was the rule that one radiologist should not be allowed to be registered with more than two clinics. This, however, was shot down since there was a dearth of radiologists in the UT.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.