Move to scrap Collegium system challenged

‘To constitute the NJAC, Article 124 should be amended. But the amendment Bill itself is under process”

August 23, 2014 10:19 am | Updated 10:19 am IST - CHENNAI:

A few days after Parliament passed the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Bill, which seeks, among other things, to do away with the Collegium system for appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and the High Courts, a city advocate has moved the Madras High Court to declare the law illegal and unconstitutional.

E. Vijay Anand said that to constitute the NJAC, Article 124 of the Constitution should be amended. But the Bill to amend the provision itself was under process. Hence, Parliament had no power to pass the NJAC Bill. There was no provision as ‘124 A’ in the Constitution when the NJAC Bill was passed. Hence, the Bill lacked authority.

The NJAC Bill was based on an unborn law, and the amendment Bill was meant to pass it, the petitioner said.

The First Bench, of Chief Justice S.K. Kaul and Justice M. Sathyanarayanan, directed the Registry to number the petition and list it for admission on August 26.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.