Left wary of impact on third alternative

Leaders of CPI and CPI(M), however, do not want to speculate on how this would impact efforts to put together a non-Congress, non-BJP alternative

March 05, 2014 09:11 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 06:29 pm IST - NEW DELHI

In this February 3, 2014 photo, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa is seen with CPI(M) leaders T.K .Rangarajan, G. Ramakrishnan and Prakash Karat after alliance talks in Chennai. Photo: S.R. Raghunathan

In this February 3, 2014 photo, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa is seen with CPI(M) leaders T.K .Rangarajan, G. Ramakrishnan and Prakash Karat after alliance talks in Chennai. Photo: S.R. Raghunathan

As seat-sharing talks between the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the two main Left parties hit a deadlock on Wednesday, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Communist Party of India maintained there was no question of settling for a seat each as was being offered to them.

Conceding a deadlock in talks, leaders of the two parties, however, did not want to speculate on how this would impact efforts to put together a non-Congress, non-BJP alternative at the Centre. In fact, Tamil Nadu was one State where the Left and the AIADMK could complement each other. Already, the Left has given up on seat-sharing with the Janata Dal (United) in Bihar, Biju Janata Dal in Odisha and Janata Dal (Secular) in Karnataka.

“The AIADMK offer is unacceptable to us as we have been contesting three seats each for the last couple of Lok Sabha elections. This is unacceptable to us.” The leaders of the two Left parties are expected to meet within the next 48 hours for evolving a joint response after the CPI State Executive meets on Thursday. The CPI(M) State Committee met on Wednesday.

Though the deadlock in Tamil Nadu has come as a setback, the Left leaders insist the third alternative was always conceived as a post-poll arrangement. “It all depends on how many seats each one wins in respective States,” Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav told The Hindu .

Similar views were articulated by a Left party leader on condition of anonymity. “Most of the 11 parties that came together in Parliament on February 5 to form a separate bloc are regional outfits and each wants to pick up the maximum number of seats possible. This was more or less expected; we do not plan to give up seats in West Bengal or Kerala.”

Explaining the rationale of the effort to prop up a non-Congress, non-BJP alternative despite inherent contradictions that are now coming to the fore, CPI(M) general secretary Prakash Karat had in an article in February 2014 said: “Since many of the parties in this emerging alternative are State-based, it is not feasible to have seat adjustments with other constituent parties in other states. But all these parties can pool their strength from their respective states for an all-India combination.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.