Karunanidhi demands interim CM; Left does not see the need

October 11, 2016 11:33 am | Updated October 12, 2016 07:21 am IST - CHENNAI

Ministers have forgotten the existence of the secretariat and officials remain indifferent, says the former chief minister.

DMK chief M. Karunanidhi made a strong case for an interim arrangement in Tamil Nadu to fulfill the essential needs of the people, saying that an active government was need of the hour when files were piling up and the Central team was touring various dams.

“Ministers have forgotten the existence of the secretariat and officials remained indifferent. Though the Chief Minister was expected to return home in a few days, the new bulletin from the Apollo hospital has made it clear that she needed a prolonged stay in the hospital,” he said in a statement.

To drive home the point that the functioning of the State government had come to a standstill, he had quoted N. Ram, former Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu , that the government was not functioning and officials were running the show.

“But ministers are not functioning. This does not mean that they are interested in doing their job. They are not in a position to do their work as they lack courage to take decisions. The power in concentrated in one hand. An alternative arrangement is needed as the government is not functioning. As per the Indian Constitution when the Prime Minister or Chief Minister is not able to perform an alternative arrangement should be made,” Mr. Karunanidhi quoted Mr. Ram as saying in an interview to the BBC Tamil Service .

Mr. Karunanidhi said since Chief Minister Jayalalithaa was in hospital, her ministers and officials were not able to take decisions on vital issues like the Cauvery Water dispute without consulting her. “The State is facing a situation in which nothing moves,” he said.

Pointing out Opposition leaders were issuing statement on their own on major issues, Mr. Karunanidhi said it was the wish of the people that either the Governor or the Centre should act immediately to explain the position of the government on these issues.

“Till the Chief Minister recovers and resumes her duties, an arrangement should be made to fulfill the essential needs of the people of the State,” he said.

Left parties’ view

CPI(M) state secretary G.Ramakrishnan told The Hindu the issue was not whether the State needed an interim Chief Minister, but whether arrangements were made to look after the departments managed by the Chief Minister. “The government should ensure that her portfolios were allotted to a minister and all departments are functioning normally,” he said, describing as ‘ridiculous’ the demand of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy that Article 356 be invoked in Tamil Nadu.

CPI state secretary R. Mutharasan felt that the AIADMK was a major political party and was capable of deciding whether the State needed an interim-Chief Minister or a Chief Minister in-charge. “They do not need our advice on the issue,” he said when asked whether an interim arrangement was required as Chief Minister Jayalalithaa was expected to stay in the hospital for a longer period.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.