The Special Court, trying a disproportionate assets case, on Saturday directed the representatives of five companies, of which Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa and other accused were directors in early 1990s, to submit in sworn affidavits by May 19 the details of all directors, shareholders and extracts of bank account statements since the inception of the firms.

Judge John Michael Cunha said the affidavits were necessary to ascertain the existence and availability of documents, which the companies now want the court to summon from the Registrar of Companies and the Director of Investigation, Income Tax, Chennai, in support of their claims over some of the attached properties, which were linked to Ms. Jayalalithaa, V.K. Sasikala, J. Ilavarasi and V.N. Sudhakaran in the charge sheet.

The court passed the order while hearing the claims made by the companies — Lex Properties Development Pvt Ltd, Meadow Agro Farms Pvt Ltd, Riverway Agro Products Pvt Ltd, Ramaraj Agro Mills Pvt Ltd and Signora Business Enterprises Pvt Ltd.

Meanwhile, the court itself has traced certified copies of the Certificate of Incorporation, the Memorandum of Association, Articles of Association, etc, of these companies from the documents marked along with the charge sheet filed by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai, in 1997.

Interestingly, the companies, which have been claiming ownership of some of the properties attached from the accused, are now against treating these papers as “court documents” while claiming that the firms are not parties in the disproportionate assets case.

However, while pointing out that these documents ought to have been produced before the court by the companies themselves, the judge said sworn affidavits providing details of the firms were essential for a quick and fair disposal of the case pending for 14 years and to ascertain the truth.

Details of the authorised share capital and paid-up shares and information on income tax and property tax returns during 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96 were among the other details sought from the companies.

RELATED NEWS

Prosecution arguments over in Jayalalithaa assets case May 20, 2014

DVAC opposes Jayalalithaa’s plea in DA caseJune 17, 2014

‘Assets case accused will have to argue if lawyers don’t’ May 23, 2014

Jayalalithaa’s aides told to be personally present on every day of hearingMay 24, 2014

Jayalalithaa assets case: court rejects Sasikala, Sudhakaran, Ilavarasi pleaMay 22, 2014

Jayalalithaa assets case: court says DVAC colluded with accusedMay 15, 2014

SC declines to defer hearing in Jayalalithaa assets case May 13, 2014

SC vacates stay on Jayalalithaa trial in assets caseApril 28, 2014

Special court sets deadline to begin arguments in Jayalalithaa assets caseMarch 16, 2014

Jayalalithaa assets case: court orders shifting of valuables to BangaloreDecember 12, 2013

New judge begins hearing of assets case against JayalalithaaNovember 21, 2013

SC dismisses Jayalalithaa plea in assets caseJune 17, 2014

Supreme Court quashes order removing Bhavani Singh September 30, 2013

“SC has no power to extend tenure of retiring judge” September 25, 2013

“Jayalalithaa’s plea to extend judge’s tenure can’t be accepted”September 24, 2013

Jayalalithaa assets case: Special court refuses to adjourn proceedingsFebruary 4, 2013

Bhavani Singh is new SPP in Jayalalithaa case February 3, 2013

Recording of Sasikala’s statement to resumeOctober 9, 2012

DMK moves SC for monitoring of assets case July 11, 2012

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against SasikalaJune 25, 2012

Karnataka High Court rejects Sasikala's pleaFebruary 3, 2012

Jayalalithaa appears in court, answers 379 questionsOctober 20, 2011

Appear before trial court, Supreme Court tells Jayalalithaa September 5, 2011

Jayalalithaa moves HC March 4, 2011

Jayalalithaa files plea against order on translation July 29, 2010

Jayalalithaa assets case: State gives undertaking to court March 17, 2010

More In: Tamil Nadu | National