The Special Court trying the disproportionate assets case against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa on Wednesday rejected a plea to postpone till June 2 the hearing of the final arguments on behalf of three other accused V.K. Sasikala, V.N. Sudhakaran and J. Ilavarasi.

Counsel for the accused have in their applications sought postponement of hearing saying that they had to study voluminous documents to argue the case besides taking into consideration the applications filed by some companies and firms (of which the accused were directors) claiming ownership over some of the attached property.

However, Judge John Michael Cunha refused to accept these applications while pointing out that it was not for the first time that the case was set for final arguments on behalf of the accused. The judge also said that the Supreme Court had, in Gurnaib Vs. State of Punjab, cautioned trial courts in granting liberal adjournments in criminal trials based on the requests made by advocates representing the accused.

“Trial courts shall keep in mind the statutory provisions and the interpretation placed by this court and not be guided by their own thinking or should not become mute spectators when a trial is being conducted by allowing the control to counsel for the parties. It needs no special emphasis to state that dispensation of criminal justice is not only a concern of the Bench but also the Bar. The administration of justice reflects its purity when the Bench and the Bar perform their duties with sincerity. An advocate cannot afford to bring any kind of disrespect to fairness of trial by taking recourse to subterfuges for procrastinating trial,” the Special Court recalled from the Supreme Court’s verdict.

RELATED NEWS

DVAC opposes Jayalalithaa’s plea in DA caseJune 17, 2014

Jayalalithaa assets case: SC extends stayJune 7, 2014

‘Assets case accused will have to argue if lawyers don’t’ May 23, 2014

Jayalalithaa’s aides told to be personally present on every day of hearingMay 24, 2014

Prosecution arguments over in Jayalalithaa assets case May 20, 2014

Jayalalithaa assets case: court seeks affidavits from companiesMay 18, 2014

Jayalalithaa assets case: court says DVAC colluded with accusedMay 15, 2014

SC declines to defer hearing in Jayalalithaa assets case May 13, 2014

SC vacates stay on Jayalalithaa trial in assets caseApril 28, 2014

SC dismisses Jayalalithaa plea in assets caseJune 17, 2014

Special court sets deadline to begin arguments in Jayalalithaa assets caseMarch 16, 2014

Jayalalithaa assets case: court orders shifting of valuables to BangaloreDecember 12, 2013

New judge begins hearing of assets case against JayalalithaaNovember 21, 2013

Supreme Court quashes order removing Bhavani Singh September 30, 2013

“SC has no power to extend tenure of retiring judge” September 25, 2013

“Jayalalithaa’s plea to extend judge’s tenure can’t be accepted”September 24, 2013

Jayalalithaa assets case: Special court refuses to adjourn proceedingsFebruary 4, 2013

Bhavani Singh is new SPP in Jayalalithaa case February 3, 2013

Recording of Sasikala’s statement to resumeOctober 9, 2012

DMK moves SC for monitoring of assets case July 11, 2012

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against SasikalaJune 25, 2012

Karnataka High Court rejects Sasikala's pleaFebruary 3, 2012

Jayalalithaa appears in court, answers 379 questionsOctober 20, 2011

Appear before trial court, Supreme Court tells Jayalalithaa September 5, 2011

Jayalalithaa moves HC March 4, 2011

Jayalalithaa files plea against order on translation July 29, 2010

Jayalalithaa assets case: State gives undertaking to court March 17, 2010

More In: Tamil Nadu | National