Jaya death: SC dismisses plea opposing panel

Petitioner said it was set up unilaterally without prior legislative debate

November 04, 2017 07:48 am | Updated 07:48 am IST - NEW DELHI

NEW DELHI, 13/07/2016: A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously quashed Arunachal Pradesh Governor J.P. Rajkhowa's decision to advance the Assembly session from January 14, 2016 to December 16, 2015, a move which triggered political unrest in the sensitive border State and culminated in the declaration of President's rule on January 26, in New Delhi. 
Photo: R. V. Moorthy

NEW DELHI, 13/07/2016: A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously quashed Arunachal Pradesh Governor J.P. Rajkhowa's decision to advance the Assembly session from January 14, 2016 to December 16, 2015, a move which triggered political unrest in the sensitive border State and culminated in the declaration of President's rule on January 26, in New Delhi. Photo: R. V. Moorthy

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition challenging the Tamil Nadu government's appointment of a one-man Commission of Inquiry headed by retired Madras High Court judge, Justice A. Arumughaswamy, to probe the death of AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa.

A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra dismissed the petition, orally observing that there was no need for the Supreme Court to intervene.

SLP filed

The special leave petition was filed by Chennai resident P.A. Joseph in the Supreme Court after the Madras High Court chose to dismiss the allegations in an order on October 4, 2017.

The petition primarily contended that the Commission of Inquiry was set up by the Tamil Nadu government unilaterally without prior legislative debate or resolution.

It contended that the prior resolution by Parliament or the State Legislative Assembly was mandated under Section 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act,1952.

Mr. Joseph termed the High Court order of October 4 as a “glaring illustration of the misinterpretation of Section 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.