Home buyers exploring options against errant builders

Many of those affected are seeking opinions from legal experts for relief

July 08, 2017 11:10 pm | Updated July 09, 2017 07:50 am IST - Chennai

CHENNAI: 19/12/2014 : FOR METROPLUS : An ariel view of Anna Nagar from the Anna Nagar Tower. Photo : K .Pichumani

CHENNAI: 19/12/2014 : FOR METROPLUS : An ariel view of Anna Nagar from the Anna Nagar Tower. Photo : K .Pichumani

Legal experts in the city are getting enquiries from home buyers on possible relief against errant builders for non-delivery of projects under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (IBC), which deals mainly with default or failure in payment of dues.

Under the code, 180 days are given to arrive at a feasible solution involving a Resolution Professional (RP) on the default issue by formulating a Resolution Plan and the timeline can be extended by another 90 days by the adjudicating authority (NCLT). If no solution is found, the RP becomes liquidator by an Order of NCLT.

“Home buyers are enquiring about getting relief under the IBC in case of failure to deliver flats. However, against these expectations, there is a recent negative ruling on this issue,” said S. Dhanapal, senior partner, S. Dhanapal and Associates, Firm of Practising Company Secretaries, Chennai.

The National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench New Delhi, had rejected an application filed by Nikhil Mehta against AMR Infrastructure Limited for insolvency proceedings.

As per the agreement between the parties, the buyers had booked two commercial and one residential property, for which advances was paid. The agreement also provided for payment of a stipulated fixed amount as assured return on a monthly basis by AMR Infra till the date of delivery. AMR defaulted on the payments to the buyers, who went ahead with insolvency proceedings.

However, NCLT refused to admit the petition, saying that the buyers were not financial/operational creditors under the definition of IBC.

“Such a ruling might be used as a reference for dealing with future cases on the issue. However, we have to wait till the IBC evolves and how future verdicts are delivered. Therefore, looking at the current situation, the best way for seeking relief for non-delivery would be under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016,” Mr. Dhanapal said.

The Tamil Nadu government has notified the rules for Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). The rule imposes strict punishment for non-delivery.

“RERA would be the right forum for non-delivery related issues. IBC relief may not be available when RERA comes into force,” Chennai-based advocate G. Shyam Sundar also said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.