Won’t interfere in AIADMK meet: HC

Plea filed by Vetrivel was earlier rejected by another judge

September 11, 2017 11:38 am | Updated 10:48 pm IST - CHENNAI

A view of the Madras High Court.

A view of the Madras High Court.

A Division Bench of the Madras High Court too on Monday refused to injunct AIADMK factions led by Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami and Deputy Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam from holding a joint general council meet on Tuesday.

Justices Rajiv Shakdher and Abdul Quddhose refused to interfere with the conclusion arrived at by Justice C.V. Karthikeyan who, this morning, refused to stay the meet on a case filed by Perambur MLA P. Vetrivel, owing allegiance to T.T.V. Dhinakaran.

Mr. Justice Karthikeyan had also imposed a cost of ₹1 lakh on the MLA after terming the suit as a vexatious litigation. The judge said that it has become a “condemnable” practice for the litigants to file civil suits by making men on their side as defendants so that the latter could “stab the other defendants on their back” at an opportune moment.

He also wondered how could the MLA have filed the suit against other MLAs and Ministers without bringing it to the notice of the Chief Justice in accordance with a circular issued by the court in March this year. The judge refused to buy the argument of the petitioner that the case had been filed in his individual capacity and not as an MLA.

‘An individual grievance’

If that was so, the judge said that the case projected by the petitioner before the court should be construed only as an individual grievance and not a collective grievance of a group of party cadre. If it was only an individual grievance, the petitioner could exercise one of the three options available to him.

The petitioner could either attend the general council by honouring the invitation extended to him or choose to have sumptuous lunch alone at the venue of the meeting to the envy of others, or alternatively, ignore the invite and sit at home, the judge suggested. He could certainly not be allowed to file a vexatious litigation, Mr. Justice Karthikeyan added.

In so far as the request made by the petitioner’s counsel to grant liberty to approach the Election Commission against the general council meet is concerned, the judge said that no one could prevent any person from approaching an appropriate forum to ventilate his grievances.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.