Framing of charges in armed vessel case on August 24

Framing of charges against all the accused in the case pertaining to detention of armed vessel off the Tuticorin coast has been fixed for August 24.

August 13, 2015 12:00 am | Updated March 29, 2016 03:00 pm IST - TIRUNELVELI:

Framing of charges against all the accused in the case pertaining to detention of armed vessel off the Tuticorin coast has been fixed for August 24.

When the case came up for hearing on Wednesday, District Principal Sessions Judge N. Rajasekar ordered all the accused to be present in the court on August 24 as charges against them would be framed on that day.

M.V. Seaman Guard Ohio, a Sierra Leone-registered vessel owned by a company in Washington D.C., was found anchored off the Tuticorin port with a huge cache of prohibited firearms, ammunition and fuel on October 12, 2013 and subsequently detained by the Indian Coast Guard.

All ten sailors and 25 armed guards in the ship were also arrested by the ‘Q’ Branch of the State CID.

After the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court quashed charges framed against them under the Arms Act, saying that there was nothing wrong in the ship possessing arms and ammunition as it was involved in “anti-piracy business” and acquitted all 35, the ‘Q’ Branch police made an appeal in the Supreme Court, which quashed the single judge’s order acquitting the personnel.

Moreover, the apex court also ordered the Tuticorin District Principal Sessions Court to complete the trial of the case and give its judgment within six months.

Based on this ruling, the case came up for hearing before Judge Mr. Rajasekar on Wednesday, who ordered the staff to arrange for interpreters since most of the accused in this case are foreigners.

While all 35 persons accused under the Arms Act and 7 persons connected to the illegal diesel supply to this ship were present in the court, one Maria Antony Vijay did not appear before the court when the trial commenced.

Adjourning the case to August 24, the Judge ordered all the accused to present in the court on that day as charges would be framed against them.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.