Forgery complaint against 'Vishwaroopam' producers

No resolution was passed on banning any film, says association

May 16, 2013 11:00 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 10:30 pm IST - CHENNAI:

CHENNAI : TAMILNADU : 28/12/2012  :  Actor Pooja Kumar, Vikas Singh, CEO, Bharti Airtel Kerala and Tamil Nadu, actor kamal Haasan, Shashi Arora, CEO DTH and Media, Bharti Airtel, and Actor Andrea Jeremiah at the press conference and launch of innovative marketing initiative around the premier of Kamal Haasan spy thriller Vishwaroopam on the Airtel DTH platform. Photo : R_Ravindran.

CHENNAI : TAMILNADU : 28/12/2012 : Actor Pooja Kumar, Vikas Singh, CEO, Bharti Airtel Kerala and Tamil Nadu, actor kamal Haasan, Shashi Arora, CEO DTH and Media, Bharti Airtel, and Actor Andrea Jeremiah at the press conference and launch of innovative marketing initiative around the premier of Kamal Haasan spy thriller Vishwaroopam on the Airtel DTH platform. Photo : R_Ravindran.

The Tamil Nadu Film Exhibitors Association has filed a petition before the Madras High Court for a direction to the Chennai Police to act on a complaint regarding an alleged forged document.

The association said Raaj Kamal Film International, which produced the Kamal Haasan-starrer ‘Vishwaroopam’ had preferred a complaint with the Competition Commission of India. The producer’s allegation was that the association had passed a “resolution” banning the theatrical release of any film, the DTH version of which had already been released.

Claiming that the association had never passed any such resolution, it wondered how Raaj Kamal could make such a complaint before the Commission when its partner, Kamal Haasan, had thanked the organisation for its unstinted support for the film.

The resolution was on the letterhead of one Tamil Nadu Theatre Owners Association, an organisation which did not even exist. But the registration number of the petitioner association had been used in the letterhead. Thus, the resolution was a forged document.

Based on Raaj Kamal’s complaint, the Competition Commission ordered an investigation by its Director-General (Investigation), who issued notice to the petitioner association.

The petitioner said it gave a complaint to the police Commissioner on April 15. However, the police refused to act on the complaint. Not even the Community Service Register copy was given as acknowledgment of receipt of the complaint.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.