EC says Jayalalithaa violated model code

The poll panel had issued notice to her for announcing new schemes while campaigning for the Yercaud bypoll

December 06, 2013 08:51 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 07:53 pm IST - New Delhi

This November 28, 2013 photo shows AIADMK general secretary and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa during campaigning for the Yercaud Assembly bypoll.

This November 28, 2013 photo shows AIADMK general secretary and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa during campaigning for the Yercaud Assembly bypoll.

The Election Commission has rejected the contention of Chief Minister and All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) general secretary Jayalalithaa, who claimed that she did not make any announcement of new schemes while campaigning for her party candidate on November 28 during the run-up to Yercaud Assembly by-poll.

tressing that she violated the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) by announcing new schemes, the Commission, headed by Chief Election Commissioner V.S. Sampath, advised her “to be careful in future and not make such announcements of new schemes for electorate with a view to alluring them”.

The Commission’s order was issued in response to Ms Jayalalithaa’s reply to the notice issued by the EC on the code violation issue.

Quoting the Supreme Court’s judgment of July 2013 in the Subramanian Balaji versus Govt. of Tamil Nadu and others case on the role of the Code in ensuring a level playing field, the Commission stated that “all political parties, and more so its prominent leaders, are expected to scrupulously follow the Model Code of Conduct, in letter and spirit, and not resort to any subterfuge to circumvent its provisions….”

On the aspect of conjunctive reference to the requirements of the area and assurance to meeting development requirements of the area by the State government, the EC stated that going by the video recording of her campaign speech, the audience present “cheered and welcomed the announcements”, and the “specific schemes mentioned by her” area-wise in her speech were not part of ongoing schemes as claimed by her. It was not “mere surmise and suspicion” but the “stark facts” that necessitated the initiation of the action against her. The conjunctive reference “tantamounts” to announcement of new schemes for the Yercaud electorate, constituting violation of the code.

The EC regretted the wrong spelling of her name in the notice issued to her on December 2, as pointed out by Ms. Jayalalithaa, and said it was “inadvertent”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.