Diploma certificates in education: HC asks government to check parity

“The G.O. was meant to achieve high quality education”

June 09, 2014 03:05 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:24 pm IST - CHENNAI:

Upholding a Tamil Nadu G.O. of December 2009 relating to diploma certificates in education obtained from the Board of Karnataka, the Madras High Court has directed the State government to consider whether or not the D. Ed. course done by 10 persons in the neighbouring State was equivalent to the Tamil Nadu diploma course.

This was in view of a peculiar situation, the court said.

Justice T. Raja passed the order on writ petitions filed by A. Sumia and others.

They joined D. Ed. in 2008-2009 in Karnataka, which had been recognised by the National Council for Teacher Education, and successfully completed their first-year course. They were about to write the second-year examination in August 2010 when Tamil Nadu issued the G.O, dated December 3, 2009.

In the G.O., the government said D. Ed. certificates from the Board of Karnataka from the academic year 2008-2009 would not be evaluated. The certificates of students admitted during 2007-2008 alone would be considered. This was because Tamil Nadu had changed the syllabus for D. Ed. It had been implemented from 2008-09, but students of D. Ed. obtained in Karnataka had studied under the 2002 syllabus. When the G.O. was issued, the government gave restrospective effect to it for students who had already been admitted to diploma-level teacher education institutions in Karnataka from 2008-09. As a result, the petitioners were affected.

The Tamil Nadu government submitted that the G.O. was meant to achieve high quality education.

Mr. Justice Raja said he was in agreement with the entirety of the G.O. It was introduced in December 2009. However, refusal of evaluation certificates to candidates who had obtained diploma certificates in other States after 2008-2009 could not be accepted. This was mainly because the G.O. issued with retrospective effect prejudiced the rights of the petitioners. When the G.O. was issued, all the petitioners had completed their first year and joined the second year. They had also completed the course within eight months of the date of the G.O.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.