Devipattinam archakas’ plea to protect livelihood

hey were rendered jobless overnight after the department took over the management in January.

June 07, 2016 12:00 am | Updated September 16, 2016 11:20 am IST - Ramanathapuram:

Archakas with family members from Devipattinam at the Collectorate in Ramanathapuram on Monday.— Photo: L. Balachandar

Archakas with family members from Devipattinam at the Collectorate in Ramanathapuram on Monday.— Photo: L. Balachandar

Rendered jobless after the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR and CE) Department took over the control of the Navapashana Navagraha Temple at Devipattinam, a group of non-Brahmin archakas appealed to the Collector to protect their livelihood.

Led by K. Azhagarsamy, about 12 archakas, along with their family members, presented petitions to Collector S. Natarajan here on Monday urging him to prevail upon the HR and CE Department and allow them to perform Navagraha puja in the historic sea temple.

Mr. Azhagarsamy said they were part of the 50 priests – Brahmins and non-Brahmins –who had been performing rituals for pilgrims visiting the temple for several years. They were rendered jobless overnight after the department took over the management in January.

While the Brahmin priests performed ‘pariharams’ for those who offered worship at the temple with special prayers, the non-Brahmin priests performed the Navagraha pujas, Mr. Azhagarsamy said.

After the Brahmin priests left the temple around 11 p.m., they would help the pilgrims and devotees with pujas, he said.

After taking over the administration of the temple, the department had appointed two priests who performed the rituals and the non-Brahmin archakas were not allowed to perform the pujas, the petitioners said. They also claimed that they were well versed in Sanskrit and had been certified by K. Pitchai Gurukal, chief priest of Sri Karpaga Vinayakar temple in Pillaiyarpatti, to perform pujas.

They had undergone a one-month course at Sri Karpaga Vinayakar Veda Agama Vidhyalayam at Pillaiyarpatti, the petitioners claimed. The Brahmin priests had no problems as they continued their profession and performed the ‘pariharams’ outside the temple, but the non-Brahmin priests had no means of livelihood, they said. The petitioners were the sole breadwinners of their families and depended on the money given by the pilgrims to take care of their families and educate their children.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.