National » Tamil Nadu

Updated: February 10, 2012 14:59 IST

Court refuses relief to Sasikala in wealth case

J. Venkatesan
Comment (1)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Sasikala coming out of the special court in Bangalore in this July 27, 2011 photo. K. Bhagya Prakash
Sasikala coming out of the special court in Bangalore in this July 27, 2011 photo. K. Bhagya Prakash

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to give any relief at this stage to Sasikala, co-accused in the disproportionate assets case against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, seeking translated versions of questions framed by the special court in Tamil. The trial will resume in the special court on February 18.

A Bench of Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice B.S. Chauhan did not agree with the submissions of the senior counsel for the petitioner, V. Giri that translated versions of the questions be kept as part of the record.

The Bench told the counsel that since there was already an interpreter in the special court, ably assisted by the petitioner's counsel, any problem in the translation during the questioning could be sorted out by the Presiding officer.

“Provisions existent”

Justice Sathasivam told the counsel “Everyday we are facing similar cases from across the country. There are provisions in the Cr.P.C. to take care of such situations. If questions are asked in English the interpreter will put to you [Sasikala] in Tamil. You are going to answer in Tamil, which is going to be translated into English. If there is any problem in translation there are counsel to correct it then and there.”

When the bench was inclined to dismiss the appeal against the Karnataka High Court order, counsel said “We will participate in the questioning. If there is any problem during the questioning, we will come to the court again.”

The Bench without expressing any opinion adjourned the hearing by three weeks. In her petition, Ms. Sasikala contended that the translated version of the evidence from Tamil to English was defective and not a true translation.

Questions procedure

The procedure adopted to translate the evidence from Tamil to English was also not in accordance with law. The defective translation would cause prejudice resulting in miscarriage of justice. She prayed for quashing the impugned order.

More In: Tamil Nadu | National | News

There is a factual error in your above report. The case was
transferred to Bangalore by Supreme court on the petition filed by
Mr.Anbalagan, Gen.Secy. of DMK during AIADMK regime and not vice
versa. Please publish the correct version as such mistakes should not
creep in your reporting being a reputed national paper.

Posted on: Feb 9, 2012 at 23:18 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Jayalalithaa wealth case

More Jayalalithaa wealth case »








Recent Article in Tamil Nadu

Sri Lanka navy ‘rescues’ 8 Indian fishermen

Officials in Tamil Nadu, however, said that they had been arrested for alleged poaching. »