Committee identifies 16 districts as difficult areas for doctors to serve

Categorises health institutions, spells out ways of incentivising their services

February 27, 2018 01:10 am | Updated 01:10 am IST - CHENNAI

P. Umanath committee categorised the health institutions as A, B, and C

P. Umanath committee categorised the health institutions as A, B, and C

The Committee set up to study the need to incentivise government service doctors has strongly recommended that the earlier method of 50% reservation for all postgraduate and PG diploma seats should be continued. This would be in addition to incentivising doctors who choose to work in difficult and inaccessible terrains in the State.

The P. Umanath committee categorised the health institutions as A, B, and C. Those in difficult terrains would get the maximum incentives allowed, while those identified with medium difficulty will get 40% of the maximum permissible incentive mark and those who would not benefit from the incentive marks at all.

Dr. Umanath’s report states that of the approximately 1.27 lakh doctors registered with the Tamil Nadu Medical Council, 30,000 doctors are working in various government health institutions and around one lakh doctors are practising in the State.

The report acknowledged that the problem of distribution of specialists depended on the availability of PG qualified doctors, adding that incentivisation framework is aimed at those courses for which admission is not centralised. The committee has declared 16 districts in the State as ‘difficult areas’ to serve. These include Ariyalur; Cuddalore; Dharmapuri; Dindigul; Nagapattinam; Nilgiris; Perambalur; Pudukottai; Ramanathapuram; Sivaganga; Theni; Thiruvannamalai; Thiruvarur; Vellore; Villupuram; and Virudhunagar.

Report uploaded

The report of the committee set up in 2017 to identify the areas, headed by P. Umanath, has been uploaded on the website of the Directorate of Medical Education.

In 2017, admission to postgraduate courses in medical colleges caused plenty of heartburn. Almost all PG seats went to government candidates as they are awarded an additional of 10% to a maximum of 30% marks for serving in difficult regions.

Protests by doctors during the admission process resulted in a series of litigations.

While in-service government doctors demanded reservation in PG seats for serving in government hospitals, non-service candidates protested that the State had an unfair system of giving marks and as a result they did not get seats.

An analysis of the various aspects revealed that the availability of doctors depended on preferred and less preferred districts, locations and areas of function.

“The incentivisation framework prescribed by this committee, would be the most apt solution to incentivise doctors to enter government service and move to needy institutions and difficult areas of function. Hence, this issue may continuously be taken up with MCI and the Union Government,” the report said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.