Bench bans quarrying near archaeological site in Keezhavalavu

February 24, 2011 02:01 am | Updated 02:01 am IST - MADURAI:

Huge block of granite stock yard at a hillock at Keezhavalavu, near Madurai.

Huge block of granite stock yard at a hillock at Keezhavalavu, near Madurai.

The Madras High Court Bench here on Wednesday restrained Tamil Nadu Minerals Limited (TAMIN), a State government undertaking, from quarrying near a hillock containing ancient Jain abodes, frescoes and Tamil Brahmi inscriptions at Keezhavalavu Panchayat in Melur Taluk near here.

Allowing a public interest litigation petition, Justices N. Paul Vasanthakumar and R. Subbiah directed the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests to protect the Keezhavalavu hillock from extinction besides ensuring proper protection of the Jain abodes and other relics.

The judges rejected the stand taken by TAMIN as well as the Madurai Collector that no damage would be caused to the archaeological site as the quarrying operations were being conducted 300 metres away from the hillock using a specialised chemical for blasting rocks without emitting any noise.

Writing the judgement, Mr. Justice Vasanthakumar pointed out that Article 49 of the Constitution mandates the State Government to protect every monument or place or object or artistic or historic interest from spoliation, disfigurement, destruction, removal, disposal or export.

“Moreover, the Archaeological Survey of India had filed a counter affidavit stating that they have addressed a letter to the District Collector to stop the quarrying operations in the said site. Hence, we are of the view that quarrying cannot be allowed to continue in the entire area spread over 51.77 acres,” the Bench said.

A. Mahaboob Batcha, Managing Trustee of Society for Community Organisation (SOCO) Trust, a non-governmental organisation based in Madurai and two other individuals — S. Bhuvaneswari and G. Pandi — had filed the present PIL petition in 2008 to protect the archaeological sites.

Petitioners' counsel T. Lajapathi Roy claimed that the hillock as well as its adjoining area spread over 51.77 acres were declared as a protected monument by a notification issued as early as on July 14, 1921. Nevertheless, TAMIN began quarrying in the locality since 2007 despite objections raised by the local body.

While admitting the PIL petition on September 23, 2008, the High Court had passed an interim injunction restraining TAMIN from quarrying near the site. It had also appointed two advocate commissioners to inspect the site in order to ascertain the genuineness of the petitioners' allegations.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.